For the seventh installment of his “Candidates Game of the Day” series, GM Jacob Aagaard has analyzed Maxime Vachier-Lagrave's huge victory over co-leader Ian Nepomniatchtchi as only he could – deeply, extensively, definitively. This is the analysis that the experts will be quoting tomorrow, and we have it exclusively here at Chess Life Online.
Below we provide Aagaard’s analysis in replayable format. For those who prefer paper, boards, and pieces, we have created a pdf version.
You can also check out an alternative replayable version posted in the ChessBase Cloud.
Aagaard writes:
Previous "Aagaard on the Candidates" installments: Round 1 - Giri-Nepomniachtchi Round 2 - Caruana-Alekseenko Round 3 - Ding Liren-Caruana Round 4 - Vachier-Lagrave - Grischuk Round 5 - Nepomniachtchi - Wang Hao Round 6 - Nepomniachtchi - Ding Liren Round 7 - Vachier-Lagrave - Nepomniatchtchi
MVL shares the lead with Nepomniachtchi after the first half. Having more decisive games is the first tiebreak, which falls to Nepomniachtchi, while MVL would take it on the second tiebreak, having defeated his competitor. I have to say I still find it hard to see MVL winning the tournament. He won this game against feeble play and against Ding Liren who blundered badly in the opening. He needs to show more before the end, I would expect. Any of the players on 50% would catch up with him by beating him. I still think the final winning score will be +3.
[pgn] [Event "FIDE Candidates Tournament"] [Date "2020.03.25"] [Round "7.2"] [White "Vachier Lagrave, Maxime"] [Black "Nepomniachtchi, Ian"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C18"] [WhiteElo "2767"] [BlackElo "2774"] [Annotator "Aagaard & Castellanos"] [PlyCount "83"] [EventDate "2020.??.??"] 1. e4 e6 {Nepomniachtchi has not really played the French for the last half decade, and clearly prepared it for this tournament. As he had no doubt not planned to be in a big lead by the end of the first half of the tournament, there seems to have been no solid alternative available to him. We should mention that Nepomniachtchi's main weapon against 1.e4 is the Najdorf, where MVL is probably the biggest expert in the World.} 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. a3 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Ne7 7. h4 (7. Qg4 {is still the main line of course.}) 7... Qc7 8. h5 h6 ({Many games have been played in the sharp line arising after} 8... cxd4 9. cxd4 Qc3+ 10. Bd2 Qxd4 11. Nf3 Qe4+ 12. Be2 Nf5 13. Kf1 {, where the black queen can be in quite a lot of danger.}) 9. Rb1 b6 10. Qg4 Rg8 { As the rook later has to return to h8 to defend the h7-square, I thought it made more sense to play} (10... Kf8 {immediately. However, after} 11. Rh3 Ba6 { , played in a bliz game between So and Dominguez in St Louis 2017, White would have a big improvement at his disposal.} 12. Rf3 $1 $146 {Threatening Qxe6.} Nf5 (12... Qd7 {defends e6, but after} 13. dxc5 $1 Bxf1 14. Kxf1 bxc5 15. Be3 { Black is destroyed on the dark squares.}) 13. Bxa6 Nxa6 14. Ne2 Kg8 ({The following variation is quite impressive.} 14... cxd4 15. cxd4 Qxc2 16. Rbb3 $1 Qe4 17. Rf4 Qc2 18. Rc3 Qb1 19. Ng3 {and Black is busted.}) 15. Qf4 Rf8 16. a4 {White's advantage is immense.}) 11. Bb5+ Kf8 $146 {The preparation. I have to say I am not impressed.} (11... Bd7 12. Bd3 {with the threat Bh7 is good for White. After} Nf5 {Bartel – Jaroch, Zgierz 2017, White should play} 13. Bxf5 $1 $146 exf5 14. Qg3 {with the treat of Bxh6. After} Kf8 15. Ne2 cxd4 16. O-O { Black is about to be ripped apart.}) 12. Bd3 (12. dxc5 $6 Nd7 $1 $44 {would make sense of Black's play.}) 12... Ba6 13. dxc5 Bxd3 14. cxd3 Nd7 $6 {This was played immediately.} ({I suspect that it would be better for Black to play } 14... Qxe5+ 15. Ne2 Nd7 16. cxb6 axb6 {, although White is a bit better after } 17. Qb4 {.}) 15. d4 bxc5 16. Qd1 $1 {Somehow this was not in Nepomniachtchi's preparation. Here he spent a long time deciding how to meet his opponent's preparation.} Qa5 {Nepomniachtchi did not manage to create counterplay in the game and was defeated very easily. For a game that may decide who will face the World Champion in a match, this one is a bit of a disappointment.} ({Together with a friend I investigated other ideas at this point. We thought it may be possible to fight against putting the bishop on a3 by rerouting the bishop to c4. But White has a very direct way to deal with this plan:} 16... Nb6 17. Ne2 Ke8 18. O-O Kd7 {[#]} 19. dxc5 $1 Qxc5 20. Nd4 Rab8 (20... Rgb8 21. Qg4 {is painful as well.}) 21. Qf3 Rgf8 22. a4 {White is totally winning. The bishop will arrive on a3 and Black's position is nothing but weaknesses.}) 17. Bd2 Rb8 18. Ne2 c4 ({MVL had considered if Black could try} 18... Ke8 19. O-O Kd8 {, but as suspected White can blow the centre apart. [#]} 20. c4 $1 Qxa3 21. Rxb8+ Nxb8 22. Qb1 Nbc6 23. cxd5 Nxd5 24. Qb7 Nde7 25. Rb1 {with mate.}) ({A more realistic try was} 18... Rxb1 19. Qxb1 Qa6 {, where White has a really fantastic refutation. [#]} 20. a4 $1 {A thematic pawn sacrifice. Here to make it possible to castle.} Qxa4 (20... Nc6 {goes down in the standard way.} 21. Qb5 Qxb5 22. axb5 Na5 23. O-O Nc4 {[#]} (23... Nb3 24. Be3 c4 {is an attempt to keep the rook out of the a-line. But White is positionally winning with normal moves.} 25. f4 Ke7 26. f5 Rb8 27. Nf4 { and Black is lost.}) 24. Ra1 $3 Nxd2 25. Rxa7 Ke7 26. dxc5 {and White wins.}) 21. O-O c4 {[#] White has a fantastic plan here, illustrating clearly the lack of urgency White is facing.} 22. f3 $3 {After something like 22...Nc6 23.Be1, White is ready for Bh4 and only then advance on the queenside. The key point to understand is that} (22. f4 $2 f5 $1 {and Black would suddenly be better.}) 22... f5 {does not work for Black after} 23. exf6 Nxf6 24. Nf4 Kf7 25. Re1 { with an overwhelming advantage.}) 19. O-O Rb6 20. Qc2 Rh8 {Played to be able to bring the king to the queenside without being hit hard with Qh7.} ({If Black takes the pawn, White will use the time gained to bring the bishop to a3. } 20... Qxa3 21. Bc1 Qa6 22. Rb2 $1 {White comes to the a-line and gets the bishop to a3. Black just suffers.}) 21. a4 Ke8 22. Rb4 $1 Nc6 ({It is hard to find anything worth playing for Black. For example:} 22... Nb8 23. f4 Nbc6 24. Rxb6 Qxb6 25. Rb1 Qc7 26. Bc1 {with a big advantage.}) 23. f4 Ne7 ({It makes no sense to accept the exchange sacrifice. After} 23... Nxb4 24. cxb4 Qa6 25. b5 Qb7 26. Bb4 {with f5 and Nf4 coming, White is entirely winning.}) 24. Rfb1 f5 (24... Rg8 {is more sensibly met with 25.Ng3 f5 26.Bc1, but White also has} 25. f5 $5 Nxf5 26. Nf4 Ne7 27. Bc1 {where he has won a bit time in return for a pawn. It is not something anyone would actually play. But it is fun to mention it.}) 25. Rb5 (25. Bc1 $5 {was very natural as well.}) 25... Qa6 (25... Rxb5 26. Rxb5 Qa6 {was a bit more rescilient, but after} (26... Qc7 27. Qb1 { is even worse.}) 27. Bc1 {White's advantage is overwhelming.}) 26. Bc1 Kf7 27. Ba3 Rhb8 {[#] White wins with an elementary breakthrough on the kingside.} 28. Bxe7 Kxe7 29. g4 $1 Rxb5 30. axb5 Rxb5 31. gxf5 Rxb1+ 32. Qxb1 exf5 (32... Qb6 33. Qa1 Nf8 {could be tried, but White is winning.} 34. Kf2 exf5 35. Ng3 g6 36. hxg6 Nxg6 37. Nxf5+ Ke6 38. Nxh6 Nxf4 39. Kg3 Ng6 40. Qh1 {with a winning attack. There are many lines like this, they are not especially instructive and are here only because it would be worse if they were not.}) 33. Ng3 Qb6 ( 33... Qa3 34. Nxf5+ Kd8 35. Qe1 Qf8 36. Qh4+ {and White wins.}) (33... g6 34. hxg6 Qxg6 35. Kf2 Qg4 36. Qxf5 {and the endgame is winning.}) 34. Nxf5+ Kf8 35. Qa1 $1 Qe6 (35... Qb3 36. Ne3 {is winning for White. The knight is very strong on e3.}) (35... a5 36. Ne3 {is also hopeless.}) 36. Ng3 Qg4 37. Kg2 Qxf4 ({ MVL believed that his opponent had planned to play} 37... g6 {, but decided in the end that it did not work. [#] He showed the following long variations at the press conference.} 38. Qa3+ Ke8 (38... Kg8 39. hxg6 h5 40. Qe7 {and White is winning.}) 39. Qd6 gxh5 40. e6 {Black is lost in all lines.} Nf8 (40... Nb6 41. f5 h4 42. Qb8+ Ke7 43. Qc7+ Ke8 44. Qf7+ Kd8 45. e7+ {and mate.}) (40... Nf6 41. Qb8+ Ke7 42. Qc7+ Kxe6 43. f5+ {winning the queen.}) 41. f5 h4 42. Qb8+ Ke7 43. f6+ Kxe6 44. Qe8+ Kxf6 45. Qxf8+ Kg5 46. Qg7+ Kf4 47. Qe5# {However, it is likely Nepomniachtchi was more afraid of 38.Qa5!, which wins on the spot. }) 38. Qxa7 Ke7 39. Qa3+ Kd8 40. Qd6 g5 41. hxg6 h5 42. g7 1-0 [/pgn]
Previous "Aagaard on the Candidates" installments: Round 1 - Giri-Nepomniachtchi Round 2 - Caruana-Alekseenko Round 3 - Ding Liren-Caruana Round 4 - Vachier-Lagrave - Grischuk Round 5 - Nepomniachtchi - Wang Hao Round 6 - Nepomniachtchi - Ding Liren Round 7 - Vachier-Lagrave - Nepomniatchtchi
Categories
Archives
- December 2024 (20)
- November 2024 (18)
- October 2024 (35)
- September 2024 (23)
- August 2024 (27)
- July 2024 (44)
- June 2024 (27)
- May 2024 (32)
- April 2024 (51)
- March 2024 (34)
- February 2024 (25)
- January 2024 (26)
- December 2023 (29)
- November 2023 (26)
- October 2023 (37)
- September 2023 (27)
- August 2023 (37)
- July 2023 (47)
- June 2023 (33)
- May 2023 (37)
- April 2023 (45)
- March 2023 (37)
- February 2023 (28)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (23)
- November 2022 (32)
- October 2022 (31)
- September 2022 (19)
- August 2022 (39)
- July 2022 (32)
- June 2022 (35)
- May 2022 (21)
- April 2022 (31)
- March 2022 (33)
- February 2022 (21)
- January 2022 (27)
- December 2021 (36)
- November 2021 (34)
- October 2021 (25)
- September 2021 (25)
- August 2021 (41)
- July 2021 (36)
- June 2021 (29)
- May 2021 (29)
- April 2021 (31)
- March 2021 (33)
- February 2021 (28)
- January 2021 (29)
- December 2020 (38)
- November 2020 (40)
- October 2020 (41)
- September 2020 (35)
- August 2020 (38)
- July 2020 (36)
- June 2020 (46)
- May 2020 (42)
- April 2020 (37)
- March 2020 (60)
- February 2020 (38)
- January 2020 (45)
- December 2019 (35)
- November 2019 (35)
- October 2019 (42)
- September 2019 (45)
- August 2019 (56)
- July 2019 (44)
- June 2019 (35)
- May 2019 (40)
- April 2019 (48)
- March 2019 (61)
- February 2019 (39)
- January 2019 (30)
- December 2018 (29)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (45)
- September 2018 (29)
- August 2018 (49)
- July 2018 (35)
- June 2018 (31)
- May 2018 (39)
- April 2018 (31)
- March 2018 (26)
- February 2018 (33)
- January 2018 (30)
- December 2017 (26)
- November 2017 (24)
- October 2017 (30)
- September 2017 (30)
- August 2017 (31)
- July 2017 (28)
- June 2017 (32)
- May 2017 (26)
- April 2017 (37)
- March 2017 (28)
- February 2017 (30)
- January 2017 (27)
- December 2016 (29)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (32)
- September 2016 (31)
- August 2016 (27)
- July 2016 (24)
- June 2016 (26)
- May 2016 (19)
- April 2016 (30)
- March 2016 (36)
- February 2016 (28)
- January 2016 (32)
- December 2015 (26)
- November 2015 (23)
- October 2015 (16)
- September 2015 (28)
- August 2015 (28)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- October 1991 (1)
- August 1989 (1)
- January 1988 (1)
- December 1983 (1)