Just the Rules Changes Already! – Tim Just on the 7th Edition Rulebook

Tim Just elaborates on rule changes effective with the 7th edition of the Rule Book, which can be found here. Why? One rule change will blockade the avenue traveled by the Rules Benders Association. The other adjustment sees to it that the intent and meaning of a rule’s words match. Change is inevitable.

Why: Wait and See Rules Flaw?

Your opponent calls the TD over to your contest. He claims you made an illegal move—seven moves ago. While the TD confirms your opponent’s claim you realize that you did accidently make an illegal move, while not in time pressure. You did not intend to make an illegal move, but things happen. The TD uses his “WayBack Machine” to set up the position to right before the illegality took place. He requires that you make a legal move. And as a penalty, your counterpart gets two minutes added to his playing time. So, your opponent waits to see that your illegal move resulted in a position favorable to you, and not him—plus he gets a two-minute payment for pointing that out? TJ: To eliminate this kind of unfair flaw in the rules, as of 1-1-20 rule 11D will add some wording to eliminate this delayed claim reward. The rule is not taking away the right of a player to still claim an illegal move, just their ability to receive those extra two minutes if they wait too long to speak up. To still qualify for that extra two-minute reward, the player making the illegal move claim will need to do so before making their own next move.

Why: Meaning Vs Intent.

You and your opponent are in time pressure. The game clock shows less than five minutes for each of you; i.e., time pressure. And then it happens—your counterpart makes an illegal move. You instantly call him on it. The clocks are stopped. The TD rolls back the position to match the one right before the illegal move. Your opponent must try again to make a legitimate move. The clock is started. Hold on, what happened to your two-minute reward? Both your opponent and the TD point to wording in the rulebook indicating that after the position is reinstated properly there shall be: “…no adjustment to the time on the clocks.” Penalties, they both claim, are adjustments to time on the clocks; therefore, you do not get two-minutes added to your time—say what?! That is not the intent of those words. TJ: When old Rule 11D1 was massaged, before the publication of the 7th edition, the rules givers tried to make sure that TDs did not reinstate the clock times that existed before the illegal move was made; thus, the wording: “…no adjustment to the time on the clocks.” Those words to some were interpreted to literally mean that no time adjustments of any kind were to be made to the game clock, no matter what—even adjustments for penalties. As of 1-1-20 those often-misunderstood words will be eliminated from 11D1. Penalties can be dished out, but clocks cannot be reset to show the previous time before the illegal move in time pressure. Below are the revised rules 11D and 11D1. Eliminated language is indicated by the strike out font. Any new wording is indicated in red.

11D. Illegal move.

If a player completes an illegal move by pressing the clock, in addition to the usual obligation to make a legal move with the touched piece if possible, the standard penalty specified in rule 1C2a applies (i.e. two minutes added to the opponent’s clock). If the opponent has completed a move subsequent to the illegal move, the standard penalty shall not apply. See also 11J, Deliberate illegal moves and 16D1, Illegal moves. TD TIP: A player should make sure to claim an illegal move made by his opponent before completing his next move, in order to be eligible to receive the additional time.

11D1. Illegal move in time pressure.

Time pressure is defined as a situation where either player has less than five minutes left in a time control and the time control does not include an increment or delay of 30 seconds or more. A director should not call attention to illegal moves in time pressure, only the players may make that claim. If, during the game, in time pressure, a player’s claim that one of either player’s last two moves was illegal is upheld by the TD, the position shall be reinstated to what it was before the illegal move and the procedure in rule 11A shall be followed with no adjustment to the time on the clocks. See also 16D1, Illegal moves; 11H, Director corrects illegal move in non-sudden death; and 11J, Deliberate illegal moves. BONUS QUESTION: Why was rule 16D1 eliminated as a “See also” reference from both 11D and 11D1? Answer: Rule 16D1 was eliminated some time ago—it no longer exists. The free US Chess Rules (Chapters 1+2+11 from the 7th edition rulebook) are now downloadable and available on-line. Past “Just the Rules” columns can be viewed here. Tim Just is a National Tournament Director, FIDE National Arbiter, and editor of the 5th, 6th, and 7th editions of the US Chess Rulebook. He is also the author of My Opponent is Eating a Doughnut & Just Law, which are both available from US Chess Sales and Amazon/Kindle. Additionally, Tim recently revised The Guide To Scholastic Chess, a guide created to help teachers and scholastic organizers who wish to begin, improve, or strengthen their school chess program. Tim is also a member of the US Chess Rules Committee. His new column, exclusive to US Chess, “Just the Rules” will help clarify potentially confusing regulations.

Comments

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Better yet, stop adding 2 minutes every time a player makes an illegal move. A single illegal move, caught and fixed with a minimum of fuss, is just a simple mistake, and not terribly disruptive to play. IMO a 2 minute penalty should not be a standard punishment for any infraction. Why? Because it is difficult and disruptive to adjust time on many digital clocks. If a player makes multiple illegal moves or other infractions in an apparent attempt to throw their opponent off their game, then just forfeit the game in favor of their opponent. Regardless, in this modern information age, the rule book should be published and maintained on line, and made freely available to all. Why? If you do not know the answer, then I cannot help you.

In reply to by David Hayes (not verified)

The rulebook chapters with the rules of play and tournament procedures are on-line at: https://www.sudburyriverchess.com/uschess-fide-differences.html (or the link in the article).

In reply to by David Hayes (not verified)

Hmmm...I sent a reply earlier; however, it seems to have lost its way in cyberspace. So, ... Check out the link in the first sentence of this column. It takes you to the rulebook on-line chapters that cover OTB and Blitz chess. The entire print book is 275 pages long--those three chapters cover 165 of those pages. The chapter on TD Certification (19 pages) is also posted on-line elsewhere on the site. And there are other chapters posted on the US Chess site: Ethics (6 pages) and Correspondence Chess (7 pages) to name two. 197 pages out of 275 pages of the print copy of the rulebook are on-line. Is this what you had in mind or was there something else? As for there being no penalty for an illegal move, check out rules 1C2, 1C2a, and 1C2b. Those rules gives the TD a lot of wiggle room in penalty enforcement. And if you want something different than that in penalty enforcement, the Delegates are the "powers that be" that can make that happen.

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Plain Text Comments

Share Your Feedback

We recently completed a website update. If you notice a formatting error on this page, please click here.