March Madness always comes down to the final seconds, whether we’re talking about college basketball or college chess. This year’s President’s Cup was no different.
After a back-and-forth “final four of college chess,” The University of Missouri (Mizzou) won its second President’s Cup in three years. This was Mizzou’s first year hosting the event.
Mizzou’s line-up featured GMs Aryan Tari, Isik Can, Luka Budisavljevic, and Mahel Boyer.
This year’s finalists were Mizzou, Pan-American Intercollegiate champions Webster University, University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV), and Saint Louis University (SLU).
Mizzou won with a total of 7½ game points, ahead of SLU (6/12), which finished second, a half-pointed ahead of UTRGV (5½/12).
Mizzou got off to a hot start with a 3½–½ win over UTRGV in the first round. On the top board, Tari took an advantage into a bishop-versus-knight endgame before GM Gleb Dudin found himself on the verge of equalizing before Tari crashed through.
On boards 2 and 4, both Can and Boyer found themselves with incredibly pleasant positions as Black straight out of the opening. Neither gave their opponent a chance to get back into the game.
The other match of the first round featured an upset, with the Pan-American champs falling 1½–2½ to SLU thanks to GM Viktor Gazik’s win as Black against GM Harsha Bharathakoti.
Round 2 featured the battle of leaders, and, with draws on the top three boards, it all came to Boyer:
Not all draws are equal. Tari drew a perfectly balanced game on Board 1 against GM Aryan Chopra, and Can shook hands with GM Nikolozi Kacharava in only 14 moves on Board 2. But Budisavljevic’s game against GM Viktor Gazik was more of a rollercoaster, and it nearly changed the course of the event:
Thanks to Buidsavljevic’s escape and Boyer’s conversion in Round 2 (and UTRGV’s 3–1 trouncing of Webster in the other match), Mizzou entered the final round with a 6/8 score, ahead of SLU (4/8) and UTRGV (3½/8). A solid showing in the final match would clinch the Cup for Mizzou, while there would be a tie for first if Webster held Mizzou to a low score and either SLU or UTRGV landed a lopsided win.
Despite being reduced to the role of spoilers, Webster showed up. Tari made a mistake early as White against GM Awonder Liang’s Kan Sicilian, and Liang convert smoothly from there.
The other three games were drawn, giving Webster its only point of the weekend. On Board 2, Can was in danger of losing against GM Yasser Quesada Perez, while there were never any chances for either player on Boards 3 and 4.
So, despite entering the round with a two-point lead, Mizzou still did not entirely control its own destiny. A 3½/4 score from SLU or a 4/4 score from UTRGV would produce a tie for first.
On Board 1, Chopra and Dudin drew a queen-and-pawn endgame that maybe offered Chopra and SLU some winning chances. And on Board 4, the game remained perfectly level, also resulting in a draw. As a result, Mizzou's victory was clear, and UTRGV needed to outscore SLU on the other two boards to leapfrog them in the race for second.
Indeed, the other two games each went down to the wire. On Board 2, GM Jose Gabriel Cardoso Cardoso won against Kacharava to give a point to UTRGV:
But on Board 3, Gazik scored the equalizer against Bharathakoti just when it looked like UTRGV was going to clinch the match:
When all was settled, the match was a 2–2 tie, giving SLU the second-place finish by a half-point.
For the first time, this year’s President’s Cup also featured a women’s section with the same format. The field consisted of teams from three of the same universities (SLU, UTRGV, and Webster) along with a team from University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). Mizzou’s two female players — WIMs Tea Gueci and Annmarie Muetsch — provided commentary of the matches.
Led by WGM Thalia Cervantes on top board, SLU blazed through the competition to win the inaugural event with an astounding 10/12 score (including a 3/3 match score). UTD finished second with a 7/12 score, ahead of Webster (4½/12) and UTRGV (2½/12).
SLU defeated Webster and UTRGV each by scores of 3½–½ in the first two rounds before clinching the tournament with a 3–1 win over UTD. Below are my personal favorite victories from each player on the team, presented by order of round:
All games and standings can be found on Lichess and Chess.com.
Editor's note: This article has been updated to reflect the fact that the President's Cup is scored by game points, not match points, and so there was not a tie for second place. Thanks to Dr. WIM Alexey Root for the correction. The scoring system will be explained in her forthcoming book on the President's Cup, The United States College Chess Championship: A History of the President's Cup, which will be available in October.
Categories
Archives
- October 2026 (4)
- September 2026 (27)
- August 2026 (28)
- July 2026 (36)
- June 2026 (32)
- May 2026 (30)
- April 2026 (33)
- March 2026 (27)
- February 2026 (24)
- January 2026 (24)
- December 2025 (27)
- November 2025 (29)
- October 2025 (39)
- September 2025 (27)
- August 2025 (29)
- July 2025 (43)
- June 2025 (25)
- May 2025 (24)
- April 2025 (29)
- March 2025 (29)
- February 2025 (20)
- January 2025 (24)
- December 2024 (34)
- November 2024 (18)
- October 2024 (35)
- September 2024 (23)
- August 2024 (27)
- July 2024 (44)
- June 2024 (27)
- May 2024 (31)
- April 2024 (51)
- March 2024 (34)
- February 2024 (24)
- January 2024 (26)
- December 2023 (29)
- November 2023 (26)
- October 2023 (37)
- September 2023 (27)
- August 2023 (37)
- July 2023 (47)
- June 2023 (33)
- May 2023 (37)
- April 2023 (45)
- March 2023 (37)
- February 2023 (28)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (23)
- November 2022 (32)
- October 2022 (31)
- September 2022 (19)
- August 2022 (39)
- July 2022 (32)
- June 2022 (35)
- May 2022 (21)
- April 2022 (31)
- March 2022 (33)
- February 2022 (21)
- January 2022 (27)
- December 2021 (36)
- November 2021 (34)
- October 2021 (25)
- September 2021 (25)
- August 2021 (41)
- July 2021 (36)
- June 2021 (29)
- May 2021 (29)
- April 2021 (31)
- March 2021 (33)
- February 2021 (28)
- January 2021 (29)
- December 2020 (38)
- November 2020 (40)
- October 2020 (41)
- September 2020 (35)
- August 2020 (38)
- July 2020 (36)
- June 2020 (46)
- May 2020 (42)
- April 2020 (37)
- March 2020 (60)
- February 2020 (38)
- January 2020 (45)
- December 2019 (34)
- November 2019 (35)
- October 2019 (42)
- September 2019 (45)
- August 2019 (56)
- July 2019 (44)
- June 2019 (35)
- May 2019 (40)
- April 2019 (48)
- March 2019 (61)
- February 2019 (39)
- January 2019 (30)
- December 2018 (29)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (45)
- September 2018 (29)
- August 2018 (49)
- July 2018 (35)
- June 2018 (31)
- May 2018 (39)
- April 2018 (31)
- March 2018 (26)
- February 2018 (33)
- January 2018 (30)
- December 2017 (26)
- November 2017 (24)
- October 2017 (30)
- September 2017 (30)
- August 2017 (32)
- July 2017 (27)
- June 2017 (32)
- May 2017 (26)
- April 2017 (37)
- March 2017 (28)
- February 2017 (30)
- January 2017 (27)
- December 2016 (29)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (32)
- September 2016 (31)
- August 2016 (27)
- July 2016 (24)
- June 2016 (26)
- May 2016 (19)
- April 2016 (30)
- March 2016 (37)
- February 2016 (27)
- January 2016 (33)
- December 2015 (25)
- November 2015 (23)
- October 2015 (16)
- September 2015 (28)
- August 2015 (28)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- October 1991 (1)
- August 1989 (1)
- January 1988 (1)
- December 1983 (1)






