For the second installment of his “Candidates Game of the Day” series, GM Jacob Aagaard has analyzed Fabiano Caruana's crushing round 2 victory over Kirill Alekseenko as only he could – deeply, extensively, definitively. This is the analysis that the experts will be quoting tomorrow, and we have it exclusively here at Chess Life Online.
Below we provide Aagaard’s analysis in replayable format. For those who prefer paper, boards, and pieces, we have created a pdf version.
You can also check out an alternative replayable version posted in the ChessBase Cloud.
Previous "Aagaard on the Candidates" installments: Round 1 - Giri-Nepomniachtchi Round 2 - Caruana-Alekseenko
[pgn] [Event "FIDE Candidates Tournament"] [Site "?"] [Date "2020.03.18"] [Round "2.1"] [White "Caruana, Fabiano"] [Black "Alekseenko, Kirill"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E20"] [WhiteElo "2842"] [BlackElo "2698"] [Annotator "Aagaard"] [PlyCount "67"] [EventDate "2020.??.??"] [WhiteTeam "United States"] [BlackTeam "Russia"] [WhiteTeamCountry "USA"] [BlackTeamCountry "RUS"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. f3 {This is one of the most ambitious lines for White. The upside is that it leads to active play and for once the dark squared bishop is likely to be a strong piece, which is not always the case in the Nimzo. The downsides are the many different lines Black can play here, according to Carlsen's chief second GM Peter Heine Nielsen, who helped Anand prepare this for one game in the 2008 World Championship match in Bonn against Vladimiar Kramnik. In that game Kramnik managed to surprise Anand with a novelty on move nine and got a good position.} d5 5. a3 Be7 ({A very interesting game in this line was played recently.} 5... Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 c5 7. cxd5 Nxd5 8. dxc5 Qa5 9. e4 Ne7 10. Be3 O-O 11. Qb3 Qc7 {[#] This position is one of the main tabiyas of the Nimzo and probably THE main tabiya of the 4.f3 Nimzo-Indian. The Indian number two won in very impressive style, suggesting that things are maybe not as easy for Black here as used to be the opinion.} 12. Bb5 Nec6 13. Ne2 Na5 14. Qb4 e5 15. O-O Na6 16. Bxa6 bxa6 17. Rad1 Be6 18. Rd5 Rab8 19. Qa4 Bxd5 20. exd5 Rb5 21. d6 Qc6 22. Ng3 Rxc5 23. Qg4 $1 Rc4 24. Nf5 $1 Rxg4 25. Ne7+ Kh8 26. Nxc6 Rxg2+ (26... Ra4 27. Nxa5 Rxa5 28. c4 Rxa3 29. Bxa7 Kg8 (29... Rd3 30. c5) 30. Rd1) 27. Kxg2 Nxc6 28. Rd1 Rd8 29. d7 Nb8 { [#]} 30. Rb1 $3 Kg8 (30... Nxd7 31. Rd1 Kg8 32. Bc5 $1 {and White wins.}) 31. Bc5 {1-0 (31) Vidit,S (2707)-Vaibhav,S (2599) Xingtai 2019}) 6. e4 dxe4 ({ Black has also tried} 6... c5 {immediately, but it seems that it is not a good line on account of} 7. cxd5 exd5 8. e5 Nfd7 9. Nxd5 cxd4 10. Nxe7 Qxe7 11. f4 f6 12. Nf3 fxe5 13. Bc4 $1 Nc6 14. O-O $16 {with an advantage for White, which has been known all the way back from Beliavsky – Spassky, Linares 1990.}) 7. fxe4 c5 (7... e5 {is another main line, but it used to have a poor reputation, despite some impressive games back in the 1980s.}) 8. d5 exd5 9. exd5 O-O 10. Be2 {A typical small finesse. It is possible that Black has nothing better than ...Re8 after 10.Nf3 Bg4 11.Be2, but why would you want to offer him the flexibitility.} Re8 (10... Bd6 11. Nb5 a6 12. Nxd6 Qxd6 13. Nf3 Bg4 14. O-O Nbd7 {was played in Matlakov - Predke, Izhevsk 2019. White can improve upon 15. Nh4 with the inclusion of} 15. h3 $1 $146 Bh5 16. Nh4 Bxe2 17. Qxe2 {and White has the advantage. If it is just a small edge or something serious would require a lot of work and/or some practical examples. However, I cannot see anyone entering into this position on purpose.}) 11. Nf3 Bg4 12. O-O Nbd7 $1 $146 {The first really new move of the game.} (12... Bd6 {has been played a few times, but here too White should be better after} 13. Nb5 a6 14. Nxd6 Qxd6 {, where the strong dark squared bishop should give White real chances for a long term advantage.}) {[#]} 13. d6 $5 {Caruana decided to enter a critical continuation. The key point is that Black is ready to play ...Bd6-b8. White no longer has the Nb5 resource.} Bf8 14. h3 Bh5 15. Nb5 {[#]} Re6 $2 {"Very sharp and concrete, but even unusual moves are not necessarily bad," was Caruana's diplomatic evaluation of this move. Actually, it is just bad. The rook is not seriously threatening the d-pawn, but the rook is just not well placed here or on e4.} ({The prophylactic move} 15... Rb8 $1 {was best. It is not easy for White to press for an advantage here.} {The critical move is:} 16. Nc7 $1 (16. Nxa7 $2 {would be a blunder because of} Bxd6 $1 {and Black is taking over the initiative.}) ({The engine also considers} 16. Bf4 {a serious move, when after} a6 17. Nc7 Re4 {we almost have the position from the game. The only exception is that the rook is not hanging on a8, meaning that Black is entirely equal.} 18. Bg3 Bxf3 19. Bxf3 Rd4 20. Qe1 Nb6 21. d7 Qxd7 (21... Nbxd7 $2 22. Nd5 Rc8 23. Nxf6+ Nxf6 24. Bxb7 {would heavily favour White.}) 22. Nd5 Re8 23. Nxb6 Rxe1 24. Nxd7 Rxf1+ 25. Kxf1 Rxd7 {The position is objectively equal. White has nice active pieces, but Black has an extra pawn. The two will cancel each other out.}) 16... Re4 $1 17. Bd3 Bxd6 (17... Rd4 $2 {fails on account of} 18. Nb5 $1) 18. Bxe4 Qxc7 {, when Black has a lot of compensation for the exchange. A possible space bar monkey line is the following:} 19. Bf5 {White is probably going to be better after slow play:} Ne5 (19... b5 $5 {An interesting Stockfish idea.} 20. cxb5 c4 21. Bxd7 Rd8 $1 22. Be3 $1 Rxd7 23. Qc1 {White has an extra exchange, but Black is very active as well. Only White can be better, which should probably be the evaluation of decent preparation from both players...}) 20. g4 Bg6 21. Nxe5 Bxf5 22. gxf5 Bxe5 23. Qf3 Rd8 24. Bf4 { where we are likely to enter into a technical phase, where Black could be OK if the knight was on d4, but here where it is far from there, he will have to find a number of decent moves to avoid ending up in a worse ending.}) 16. Bf4 a6 17. Nc7 Re4 18. Bh2 $6 (18. Qd2 $1 Rb8 (18... Bxf3 19. Bxf3 Rd4 20. Qe3 Rb8 21. Rfd1) 19. Rad1 Nb6 20. b3 Bxf3 21. Rxf3 Nbd7 22. b4 $18) 18... Rc8 $6 ( 18... Rb8 $5) 19. g4 $1 (19. Qc2 Ne5 20. Rad1 Bg6 21. Nxe5 Rxe5 22. Qd2 Re4 23. Qe1 Bh5 $13) 19... Bxg4 (19... Nxg4 20. hxg4 Rxg4+ 21. Kh1 Rg6 22. Rf2) 20. hxg4 Nxg4 21. Bd3 $1 Nxh2 22. Bxe4 Nxf1 23. Qxf1 {Fabiano correctly evaluated his position as better at this point, mainly due to the control of the d5-square, while after his opponent's next move, he dialed his expectations up to "winning."} Bxd6 $2 (23... Nf6 24. Re1 (24. Ng5 $5 Qxd6 25. Nd5 Qg3+ 26. Qg2 Nxe4 27. Nxe4 Qh4 28. Qh1 Qxh1+ 29. Kxh1 Rc6) (24. Bf5 Rb8) 24... Nxe4 25. Rxe4 Qxd6 26. Nd5 Qg6+ $6 (26... b5 27. b3 bxc4 28. bxc4 Rb8 {is probably a better fighting chance for Black, but his position i still very unpleasant. For example:} 29. Kf2 $1 $14 {, when the king is safe from all counterplay.}) 27. Qg2 Qxg2+ 28. Kxg2 $16 {Caruana evaluated this as better for White, as three pawns for the pieces is not enough compensation for the strong knight on d5, as it is hard/impossible for him to advance the pawns at all.}) 24. Nd5 g6 ({ Caruana gave the following beautiful variation in his post-game commentary:} 24... Ne5 25. Nxe5 Qg5+ 26. Qg2 Qxe5 (26... Qxg2+ 27. Kxg2 Bxe5 28. Ne7+ { is not an option.}) 27. Qh3 $1 Qd4+ 28. Kf1 f5 $5 (28... Qxc4+ 29. Bd3 $1) 29. Bxf5 Qxc4+ 30. Kg1 Qd4+ 31. Ne3 {and there are no more useful checks, making the double attack the most important thing in the position.}) 25. Qh3 Kg7 { Caruana said that he saw no defence for his opponent. I doubt there is one.} ( 25... Rc6 $5 {was a small trap that would not have worked on this level. Obviously Caruana would not fall for 26.Qxd7?? Bh2+! when Black wins. Instead after} 26. Rd1 {White would keep a strong attack going.}) (25... Ne5 26. Nxe5 Bxe5 {would bring a lot of relief, if it was not for} 27. Qxc8 $1 {.}) {[#]} 26. Kh1 $1 ({Stockfish gives a feverish and wholly unnatural move at this point:} 26. Bf5 $6 {However, it is definitely flashy! The tactics are very bizarre and not all trustworthy when you are sitting at the board.} gxf5 27. Kf2 Nf8 $1 28. Rg1+ Ng6 29. Ng5 Qh8 30. Qxf5 Qf8 {White has a win here, but it is ridiculous.} 31. Qd7 Re8 32. Rh1 $1 h6 {[#]} 33. Nh7 $3 Kxh7 34. Nf6+ Kh8 35. Qxe8 {and the endgame should win, but only if you get here. The key point to understand is that there are a lot of possibilities for something you could have missed on the way. When this is the only path, you accept it. When there are many options, you go for something that is easily controlable.}) 26... Ne5 27. Nh4 $1 {The exchange of knights would reduce the pressure against the black king.} h5 $6 {Objectively this is the losing move, but in practice I consider the black position entirely unplayable.} (27... Rc6 {was potentially more resilient, but we are near the end all the same. After} 28. Rg1 Bf8 29. Nf4 Rb6 30. Bd5 $16 {White is dominating. A key thing to understand is that} Rxb2 $6 31. Nf5+ Kg8 32. Qc3 $1 {wins the exchange as a minimum and that is after} Qf6 33. Qxb2 Qxf5 34. Rf1 {.}) 28. Rg1 Bf8 ({Caruana was no doubt enjoying himself at this point. While his opponent is desperately looking for anything, just anything, that can give him a glimmer of hope, Caruana was enjoying himself looking at variations like this:} 28... Ng4 29. Nf5+ $1 Kg8 ( 29... gxf5 30. Bxf5 {and wins.}) 30. Rxg4 $1 hxg4 31. Qh6 Bf8 32. Nde7+ Qxe7 33. Nxe7+ Bxe7 34. Bxg6 {. Yes, the final move is not necessary, but when you are there, you may as well enjoy yourself.}) 29. Nf4 (29. Nxg6 $5 {and 30.Nf4 also wins quickly. White only needs one way to win.}) 29... Ng4 30. Nxh5+ gxh5 31. Bf5 Be7 32. Bxg4 hxg4 33. Qxg4+ Bg5 34. Qh5 {Black resigned. Mate or a fate worse than mate is coming.} 1-0 [/pgn]
Previous "Aagaard on the Candidates" installments: Round 1 - Giri-Nepomniachtchi Round 2 - Caruana-Alekseenko
Categories
Archives
- December 2024 (20)
- November 2024 (18)
- October 2024 (35)
- September 2024 (23)
- August 2024 (27)
- July 2024 (44)
- June 2024 (27)
- May 2024 (32)
- April 2024 (51)
- March 2024 (34)
- February 2024 (25)
- January 2024 (26)
- December 2023 (29)
- November 2023 (26)
- October 2023 (37)
- September 2023 (27)
- August 2023 (37)
- July 2023 (47)
- June 2023 (33)
- May 2023 (37)
- April 2023 (45)
- March 2023 (37)
- February 2023 (28)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (23)
- November 2022 (32)
- October 2022 (31)
- September 2022 (19)
- August 2022 (39)
- July 2022 (32)
- June 2022 (35)
- May 2022 (21)
- April 2022 (31)
- March 2022 (33)
- February 2022 (21)
- January 2022 (27)
- December 2021 (36)
- November 2021 (34)
- October 2021 (25)
- September 2021 (25)
- August 2021 (41)
- July 2021 (36)
- June 2021 (29)
- May 2021 (29)
- April 2021 (31)
- March 2021 (33)
- February 2021 (28)
- January 2021 (29)
- December 2020 (38)
- November 2020 (40)
- October 2020 (41)
- September 2020 (35)
- August 2020 (38)
- July 2020 (36)
- June 2020 (46)
- May 2020 (42)
- April 2020 (37)
- March 2020 (60)
- February 2020 (38)
- January 2020 (45)
- December 2019 (35)
- November 2019 (35)
- October 2019 (42)
- September 2019 (45)
- August 2019 (56)
- July 2019 (44)
- June 2019 (35)
- May 2019 (40)
- April 2019 (48)
- March 2019 (61)
- February 2019 (39)
- January 2019 (30)
- December 2018 (29)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (45)
- September 2018 (29)
- August 2018 (49)
- July 2018 (35)
- June 2018 (31)
- May 2018 (39)
- April 2018 (31)
- March 2018 (26)
- February 2018 (33)
- January 2018 (30)
- December 2017 (26)
- November 2017 (24)
- October 2017 (30)
- September 2017 (30)
- August 2017 (31)
- July 2017 (28)
- June 2017 (32)
- May 2017 (26)
- April 2017 (37)
- March 2017 (28)
- February 2017 (30)
- January 2017 (27)
- December 2016 (29)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (32)
- September 2016 (31)
- August 2016 (27)
- July 2016 (24)
- June 2016 (26)
- May 2016 (19)
- April 2016 (30)
- March 2016 (36)
- February 2016 (28)
- January 2016 (32)
- December 2015 (26)
- November 2015 (23)
- October 2015 (16)
- September 2015 (28)
- August 2015 (28)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- October 1991 (1)
- August 1989 (1)
- January 1988 (1)
- December 1983 (1)