The twelfth straight draw at the Magnus Carlsen-Fabiano Caruana match in London will send the top two chess players in the World into a rapid tiebreak for the World Championship title. The four game rapid match, followed by blitz and finally, Armageddon if needed, is set for Wednesday, November 28th (10 AM ET).
Chess fans braced themselves for anti-climax as Fabiano Caruana was surprised in the Open Sicilian, Sveshnikov Variation. In the previous two Open Sicilians, Fabiano played quickly and confidently, but this time, he quickly got under time pressure after Carlsen's new wrinkle, ....h5. There was a chance the game could end in repetition long before move 30, though Garry Kasparov later said that he was fully confident Caruana would not acquiesce to a draw.
https://twitter.com/USChess/status/1067076546366722048
Caruana was not immediately rewarded for valiantly fighting on. Instead, the American challenger found himself under pressure on the board on the clock.
https://twitter.com/USChess/status/1067107913246875648
And then, to the shock of the chess world, Carlsen offered a draw on move 31.
https://twitter.com/Kasparov63/status/1067125702712004609
https://twitter.com/USChess/status/1067130049432825863
IM Kostya Kavutskiy annotates the games, and offers his thoughts on the most controversial draw of the match.
[pgn] [Event "Carlsen-Caruana FIDE World Chess Champi"] [Date "2018.11.26"] [White "Caruana, Fabiano"] [Black "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "B33"] [WhiteElo "2832"] [BlackElo "2835"] [Annotator "Kostya"] [PlyCount "62"] [EventDate "2018.??.??"] [WhiteTeam "United States"] [BlackTeam "Norway"] [WhiteTeamCountry "USA"] [BlackTeamCountry "NOR"] 1. e4 {It's important to view this game contextually. Caruana was definitely looking for a fight, but not to go crazy for a decisive result and just take what he could get. Meanwhile, Carlsen, in his own words, was perfectly happy with a draw in order to reach the tiebreaks, looking for a solid position where he could put safe pressure without any risk of losing. Keeping that in mind, much more of Carlsen's play makes a lot of sense than it would otherwise! } c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e5 6. Ndb5 d6 7. Nd5 {Caruana repeated the same line that gave him a promising position in his last two games as White.} Nxd5 8. exd5 Ne7 $5 {But this time it is Magnus who deviates first, who was likely tired of getting surprised every game. The main move is 8...Nb8, but I'm sure Caruana's team had examined this sideline as well.} 9. c4 Ng6 10. Qa4 Bd7 11. Qb4 Bf5 12. h4 h5 $146 {A new move, after which Caruana started to think.} ({A Kramnik game referenced by commentators ever since Fabiano first went 7.Nd5 in Game 8 continued} 12... a6 13. h5 Nf4 14. Nc3 Be7 15. Be3 Nd3+ 16. Bxd3 Bxd3 17. h6 $1 $14 {which allowed White to gain a strategic advantage, 1-0 Kramnik-Roganovic, Batumi 2018.}) 13. Qa4 ({As pointed out by Kasparov,} 13. Bg5 {would seem to be the critical test of Black's play, trying to induce the weakening move f7-f6. Most likely} Qb8 $5 { would be seen if Carlsen was still in preparation here, though it's a bit unnatural from a human point of view.} ({After} 13... f6 14. Be3 {White gets an improved version of the same position in the game.}) {A potential follow-up could be} 14. Be2 a6 15. Nc3 Be7 16. Bxe7 Kxe7 17. c5 Rc8 $1 $11 {where Black is actually perfectly fine. White has other options along the way, but it's understandable why Caruana would not want to venture down these lines without sufficient preparation, something we've seen Carlsen do quite a bit in previous games.}) 13... Bd7 14. Qb4 Bf5 15. Be3 {Fabi correctly (from a sporting point of view) declined the repetition, to the praise of those watching.} a6 16. Nc3 Qc7 ({Stockfish actually suggests for Black to sacrifice a pawn with} 16... Be7 17. Qxb7 {and just} O-O $13 {which certainly seems playable but leads to an extremely sharp position. Based on how the game ended, it's pretty clear Carlsen was instead looking for stability today, not chaos.}) 17. g3 Be7 18. f3 {This move caused some controversy, though to me it looks quite sensible, as White keeps control over the e4-square.} ({After} 18. Be2 { White would need to account for} e4 {with idea of improving the knight on the e5-square.}) 18... Nf8 {A nice idea, resembling Game 1 where Carlsen first improved his knight via this square before castling.} 19. Ne4 Nd7 20. Bd3 O-O 21. Rh2 {Another controversial move, though for this one I'm not a fan. Caruana comes up with a sharp plan to castle queenside and bring the rook to c2, but concretely it gives Black excellent counterplay.} (21. Nf6+ $2 { would be an error as after} Bxf6 22. Bxf5 {Black could open lines with} e4 $1 23. Bxe4 Be5 $132 {with huge compensation against White's weaknesses.}) ({But} 21. O-O {seems like the safest option, looking to play Rac1.} Bg6 22. Qd2 { Stopping Nc5.} b5 23. Rac1 $14 {and White looks slightly better.}) 21... Rac8 22. O-O-O Bg6 23. Rc2 f5 $1 {A very useful move, kicking White's knight off of e4.} 24. Nf2 (24. Ng5 $6 {would likely be met with} Bxg5 25. hxg5 e4 $1 $15 { and strategically Black is doing excellent.}) 24... Nc5 25. f4 a5 $5 {This is where Carlsen's intent for the game starts to become clear. Instead of trying to open the queenside, given that White's king is sitting on c1, he aims to keep the position under full control.} ({The players were asked about} 25... b5 {after which Caruana felt that it was quite dangerous for White, but Carlsen more or less shrugged it off as being 'not what he wanted', despite the apparent objective strength of the move.} 26. Be2 a5 27. Qd2 b4 $17 {It's a tough situation to judge as a commentator. It seems misplaced to criticize Magnus's moves as 'second-rate' because he fully admits they weren't the best--knew during the game they weren't the best, but made them anyway as he secured his goal for the final game - reach the tiebreaks. So he sacrificed the quality of his play in this game in order to win the war--an interesting decision!}) 26. Qd2 e4 27. Be2 Be8 28. Kb1 Bf6 29. Re1 a4 ({After the game Fabiano pointed out} 29... Ba4 {as being difficult to meet, as} 30. b3 (30. Rcc1 b5 $1 31. cxb5 Qb6 $17 {and once Black wins back the b-pawn, the b-file will be difficult to defend for White.}) {would be met with} 30... Bxb3 $1 31. axb3 Nxb3 32. Qd1 a4 $1 $19 {with a devastating attack for Black, though Magnus stated very clearly that he was only interested in solidity.}) 30. Qb4 g6 31. Rd1 Ra8 {Accompanied by what most, including Kasparov could only label as an 'inexplicable' or 'shocking' or 'cowardly' draw offer, which Caruana accepted after a bit of thought. At first I was ready to brand Magnus as a coward as well, but after hearing him in the press conference, where he was very clear about his intentions for the game (shutting it down), his decision to offer a draw here seems perfectly reasonable to me. It's not like he was ever clearly winning, just better. In a tournament, he would press on undoubtedly, as we've seen him do multiple times even if a draw would clinch first place! But here, he had his mind set before the game, and accomplished what he came to do. If it was up to Kasparov, then Caissa would punish Magnus in the tiebreaks for avoiding a fight here, but we'll just have to see how things all play out. Tiebreaks ahead!} ({After the game Carlsen gave the following line as justification for his draw offer, not seeing a way to 'press without risk'.} 31... Ra8 32. Bd4 Bxd4 ({Stockfish points out} 32... Nd3 $5 33. Bxd3 Bxd4 34. Bf1 Bc5 35. Qc3 $17 {where only Black can be better with such a powerful dark-squared bishop, though this looks like a position that the computer overestimates without offering a clear pawn for improving the position.}) 33. Rxd4 Qa5 34. Qxa5 Rxa5 35. Nd1 $1 {An important maneuver, bringing the knight to c3.} b5 36. cxb5 Bxb5 37. Bxb5 Rxb5 38. Nc3 Ra5 39. Rb4 $11 {which, to Magnus's credit is indeed equal, despite Black having other options along the way, of course.}) 1/2-1/2 [/pgn]https://twitter.com/USChess/status/1067131731713642498 Interact with Eric Rosen, who is taking over our twitter@USChess using the hashtag #CarlsenCaruana. Worldchess.com is the tournament website. IM Kostya Kavutskiy is a professional chess player, coach, and writer. Check out his twitter and Patreon page for instructive chess analysis and advice for improvement.
Categories
Archives
- December 2024 (20)
- November 2024 (18)
- October 2024 (35)
- September 2024 (23)
- August 2024 (27)
- July 2024 (44)
- June 2024 (27)
- May 2024 (32)
- April 2024 (51)
- March 2024 (34)
- February 2024 (25)
- January 2024 (26)
- December 2023 (29)
- November 2023 (26)
- October 2023 (37)
- September 2023 (27)
- August 2023 (37)
- July 2023 (47)
- June 2023 (33)
- May 2023 (37)
- April 2023 (45)
- March 2023 (37)
- February 2023 (28)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (23)
- November 2022 (32)
- October 2022 (31)
- September 2022 (19)
- August 2022 (39)
- July 2022 (32)
- June 2022 (35)
- May 2022 (21)
- April 2022 (31)
- March 2022 (33)
- February 2022 (21)
- January 2022 (27)
- December 2021 (36)
- November 2021 (34)
- October 2021 (25)
- September 2021 (25)
- August 2021 (41)
- July 2021 (36)
- June 2021 (29)
- May 2021 (29)
- April 2021 (31)
- March 2021 (33)
- February 2021 (28)
- January 2021 (29)
- December 2020 (38)
- November 2020 (40)
- October 2020 (41)
- September 2020 (35)
- August 2020 (38)
- July 2020 (36)
- June 2020 (46)
- May 2020 (42)
- April 2020 (37)
- March 2020 (60)
- February 2020 (38)
- January 2020 (45)
- December 2019 (35)
- November 2019 (35)
- October 2019 (42)
- September 2019 (45)
- August 2019 (56)
- July 2019 (44)
- June 2019 (35)
- May 2019 (40)
- April 2019 (48)
- March 2019 (61)
- February 2019 (39)
- January 2019 (30)
- December 2018 (29)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (45)
- September 2018 (29)
- August 2018 (49)
- July 2018 (35)
- June 2018 (31)
- May 2018 (39)
- April 2018 (31)
- March 2018 (26)
- February 2018 (33)
- January 2018 (30)
- December 2017 (26)
- November 2017 (24)
- October 2017 (30)
- September 2017 (30)
- August 2017 (31)
- July 2017 (28)
- June 2017 (32)
- May 2017 (26)
- April 2017 (37)
- March 2017 (28)
- February 2017 (30)
- January 2017 (27)
- December 2016 (29)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (32)
- September 2016 (31)
- August 2016 (27)
- July 2016 (24)
- June 2016 (26)
- May 2016 (19)
- April 2016 (30)
- March 2016 (36)
- February 2016 (28)
- January 2016 (32)
- December 2015 (26)
- November 2015 (23)
- October 2015 (16)
- September 2015 (28)
- August 2015 (28)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- October 1991 (1)
- August 1989 (1)
- January 1988 (1)
- December 1983 (1)