Let’s start out the year by putting on our rulebook thinking caps. This quiz pushes the limits of slippery slope thinking. The solutions are at the end of the exam.
THE QUIZ
1. You and your fellow wood pusher are in time trouble. A quick calculation on your part puts your opponent in check. They swiftly grab their bishop. It slides across the board with the greatest of ease and gets firmly planted on its destination square. At that instant you point out that the bishop move is illegal. Why? Your opponent’s king is still in check.
With the clocks stopped, the TD informs your counterpart that he must put the bishop back on its starting square and make a legal move to get out of check. The penalty your opponent must suffer? You get two extra minutes of thinking time. He objects. He points out that he did not make an illegal move; therefore, there can be no penalty. He argues that he had not yet pressed the clock so his move was not yet legal or illegal, just incomplete.
(a) You get your two extra minutes of penalty thinking time.
(b) You get no extra thinking time because the move was not yet legal or illegal.
2. Your rook is pinning your counterpart’s knight to his king on e1. The knight has no other guardian. He grabs his king and sets it two squares over on g1. Your eyes bulge and your heart starts beating faster and faster. Your brain is screaming at you, “He is going to lose that knight!” He lifts his hand from the king so he can grab the rook.
He promptly halts. He notices that his knight is hanging. So, he does a U-turn and does not grab the rook. The castling maneuver is incomplete. Instead, he moves his king to the empty d1 square to protect the knight. He knows that that he must move the king since it was touched, but he argues that he does not need to castle.
(a) Your opponent must castle
(b) Your opponent does not have to castle.
3. Despite your best efforts your adversary marches their c-pawn down the board. Square after square the lowly pawn aims to raise itself up to higher standards. Now it is sitting on c2 — only one square away from your first rank. It is only one step away from getting an upgrade. Your challenger’s hand darts over to grab a queen sitting near two of her subjects — a knight and a rook — just off the edge of the board. The queen touches the c1 promotion square but stops short of being released. A trade up to a queen will create a stalemate.
The queen returns off-board next to her minions. Instead, the rook gets the nod. The waiting pawn gets removed from c2 without ever moving onto the c1 promotion square. The clock gets pressed. You claim your opponent must promote to a queen. He says the whole process was illegitimate due to the pawn never actually moving forward onto the promotion square before it was replaced. Your opponent points out he never touched the pawn so the queen swap was not required. Besides he never let go of the queen.
(a) The pawn must be promoted to a queen.
(b) The pawn can be promoted to the rook.
THE SOLUTIONS:
1. B: Be careful when you make your claim. Your opponent here is right — he did not press the clock so his move was not complete. Had you waited until the clock was pressed you would be eligible for that extra two minutes of thinking time.
2. A: Castling is the only king move that lets a monarch move two squares in either direction along the rank. This king moved two squares. The only move available at this point is to complete castling. Now, if the opponent had moved his majesty over two squares AND not released it, the castling maneuver would not be mandatory. The king could then make any other legal move.
3. A: In the older rulebooks this created a messy situation. In the current edition some extra wording by the “Law Givers” says that the promotion takes place — even if the pawn does not move onto the promotion square — as long as the upgraded promotion piece only “touches” the promotion square. In this case the queen touched the promotion square. The pawn promotes to a queen.
The free, updated US Chess Rules (Chapters 1+2 + 9 + 10 +11 from the 7th edition rulebook) are now downloadable and available online. Past “Just the Rules” columns can be viewed here. Plus listen to Tim when he was a guest on the US Chess podcast “One Move at a Time.”
Tim Just is a National Tournament Director, FIDE National Arbiter, and editor of the 5th, 6th, and 7th editions of the US Chess Rulebook. He is also the author of My Opponent is Eating a Doughnut & Just Law, which are both available from US Chess Sales and Amazon/Kindle. Additionally, Tim recently revised The Guide To Scholastic Chess, a guide created to help teachers and scholastic organizers who wish to begin, improve, or strengthen their school chess program. Tim is also a member of the US Chess Rules Committee. His new column, exclusive to US Chess, “Just the Rules” will help clarify potentially confusing regulations.
Categories
Archives
- December 2024 (33)
- November 2024 (18)
- October 2024 (35)
- September 2024 (23)
- August 2024 (27)
- July 2024 (44)
- June 2024 (27)
- May 2024 (32)
- April 2024 (51)
- March 2024 (34)
- February 2024 (25)
- January 2024 (26)
- December 2023 (29)
- November 2023 (26)
- October 2023 (37)
- September 2023 (27)
- August 2023 (37)
- July 2023 (47)
- June 2023 (33)
- May 2023 (37)
- April 2023 (45)
- March 2023 (37)
- February 2023 (28)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (23)
- November 2022 (32)
- October 2022 (31)
- September 2022 (19)
- August 2022 (39)
- July 2022 (32)
- June 2022 (35)
- May 2022 (21)
- April 2022 (31)
- March 2022 (33)
- February 2022 (21)
- January 2022 (27)
- December 2021 (36)
- November 2021 (34)
- October 2021 (25)
- September 2021 (25)
- August 2021 (41)
- July 2021 (36)
- June 2021 (29)
- May 2021 (29)
- April 2021 (31)
- March 2021 (33)
- February 2021 (28)
- January 2021 (29)
- December 2020 (38)
- November 2020 (40)
- October 2020 (41)
- September 2020 (35)
- August 2020 (38)
- July 2020 (36)
- June 2020 (46)
- May 2020 (42)
- April 2020 (37)
- March 2020 (60)
- February 2020 (38)
- January 2020 (45)
- December 2019 (35)
- November 2019 (35)
- October 2019 (42)
- September 2019 (45)
- August 2019 (56)
- July 2019 (44)
- June 2019 (35)
- May 2019 (40)
- April 2019 (48)
- March 2019 (61)
- February 2019 (39)
- January 2019 (30)
- December 2018 (29)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (45)
- September 2018 (29)
- August 2018 (49)
- July 2018 (35)
- June 2018 (31)
- May 2018 (39)
- April 2018 (31)
- March 2018 (26)
- February 2018 (33)
- January 2018 (30)
- December 2017 (26)
- November 2017 (24)
- October 2017 (30)
- September 2017 (30)
- August 2017 (31)
- July 2017 (28)
- June 2017 (32)
- May 2017 (26)
- April 2017 (37)
- March 2017 (28)
- February 2017 (30)
- January 2017 (27)
- December 2016 (29)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (32)
- September 2016 (31)
- August 2016 (27)
- July 2016 (24)
- June 2016 (26)
- May 2016 (19)
- April 2016 (30)
- March 2016 (36)
- February 2016 (28)
- January 2016 (32)
- December 2015 (26)
- November 2015 (23)
- October 2015 (16)
- September 2015 (28)
- August 2015 (28)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- October 1991 (1)
- August 1989 (1)
- January 1988 (1)
- December 1983 (1)