The State of Confusion Class Tournament advertised that some classes may need to be combined, for instance if one section has too few warriors to even pair. This tournament is a five-rounder. Playing up one class is allowed for an extra fee.
The last section — Class D & Below — is for those rated below 1400. There are only four entries and three prizes: $75-$50-$25. Imagine how happy those four players are about the odds of taking home some gold.
The next higher section — Class C — has fifteen entries including five Class D & Below players that chose to play up. The prizes there — with a top rating cap of 1599 — are: $100-$75-$50. Often, lower-rated players choose to play up so they can face tougher opposition.
The TD may decide to combine those two classes to create a new hybrid Class C/D & Below section. The only question now is what prizes can those five Class D players who chose to play up can qualify for. Can they now claim any of the newly added Class D & Below prizes that have suddenly become available via the section blending? After all, when they paid to play up, they relinquished the opportunity to compete for the prizes in the Class D & Below section.
Option One: The Class C players (1400-1599) can win only the $100-$75-$50 prizes. The original four Class D & Below wood pushers, from the lower section, qualify only for their original prizes of $75-$50-$25. The five Class D players — who shelled out extra greenbacks to play up into the higher section — can win prize money from either class.
The four D & Below wood pushers who did not elect to play up are going to be really disappointed. They are barred from taking home any of those Class C prizes. And now, they also now need to battle for “their” prizes with those other Class D & Below contestants that chose to play up. That makes it nine players seeking the $75-$50-$25 prize fund instead of just four.
Option Two: The opportunity to win gold remains the same as in option one for the C Class contestants. The lower newly added Class D & Below entrants, that moved into this upper section, still can only compete for their original prize fund. Those five Class D players that paid the extra fee to play up into the higher section get a refund for their play-up fee. But now they can only compete for the prizes set aside for Class D & Below players in this combined section.
This might make those four players from the lower D & Below class a bit grumpy. After all, there were three prizes to claim for those four weekend gamers. In the newly configured section, there are now nine players (the four initial D & Below entries plus the five playing up entries) competing for those same three original prize amounts of $75-$50-$25.
Option Three: This one should look familiar to most of us: it is essentially a prize fund like those we are used to in Under sections of other tournaments. Every player in the newly merged section can chase after the original top Class C prizes. Only the best three scoring Class D & Below players (now, all nine of them) additionally also qualify for the D & Below prizes of $75-$50-$25. The five original playing up wood pushers get refunded their extra fee.
Realistically it is not likely, now, that any of the nine Class D & Below rated players will essay many games with those Class C players. In theory the C-rated weekend gamesters will likely take home those top prizes, but one never knows for sure. Additionally, those rated below 1400 will probably now face off against each other more often — especially in the later rounds — than against the Class C players.
Option Four: Leave both sections alone. The shortfall of game players in the D & Below class section — with only four players — can be paired against each other more than once.
If the TD can get every player to agree, they might even consider a Double Round Robin where each player faces off twice against each of the other players (pushing both white wood plus black wood against each rival). Of course, for that to work the time controls would need to be tweaked to fit in the extra game needed for the double Quad pairings. Remember that the tweaked double-play Quad time controls would create more than the advertised five contests. There might be issues of noise in the tournament hall with that section’s new game schedule.
There might be one player that objects to the new time controls. Given the lack of pre-event publicity regarding any section’s low attendance alternatives, that would cancel the entire Quad idea. A Swiss pairing system of sorts, with no tweaked time controls, could be implemented. The idea would still be that some contestants would need to play each other more than once.
TJ Says: In any mid-to-large tournament with multiple sections, combining sections would probably not even be required. All of the sections would draw enough chess enthusiasts so that reasonable pairings could be made in each round. In smaller events, the need to combine sections becomes more of a reality.
I like options three and four. Why? Option three is about as fair as it gets when following the exact announcement on the pre-event publicity. Option four keeps the sections intact. Everyone receives what they expected and more; i.e., it gives more bang for the buck with the tweaked time control double-play Quad option with a bonus game added to the lower section
And let’s not get started on what to do if trophies are involved.
- The free, updated US Chess Rules (Chapters 1+2 + 9 + 10 +11 from the 7th edition rulebook) are now downloadable and available online.
- Want more? Past columns can be found here or by searching the Chess Life Online archives.
- Plus, listen to Tim when he was a guest on the US Chess podcast “One Move at a Time.”
Tim Just is a National Tournament Director, FIDE National Arbiter, and editor of the 5th, 6th, and 7th editions of the US Chess Rulebook. He is also the author of My Opponent is Eating a Doughnut & Just Law, which are both available from US Chess Sales and Amazon/Kindle. Additionally, Tim revised The Guide To Scholastic Chess, a guide created to help teachers and scholastic organizers who wish to begin, improve, or strengthen their school chess program. US Chess awarded the 2022 Tournament Director Lifetime Achievement Award to Tim. He is also a member of the US Chess Rules Committee plus the Tournament Director Certification Committee (TDCC). His new column, exclusive to US Chess, “Just the Rules” will help clarify potentially confusing regulations.
Categories
Archives
- December 2024 (32)
- November 2024 (18)
- October 2024 (35)
- September 2024 (23)
- August 2024 (27)
- July 2024 (44)
- June 2024 (27)
- May 2024 (32)
- April 2024 (51)
- March 2024 (34)
- February 2024 (25)
- January 2024 (26)
- December 2023 (29)
- November 2023 (26)
- October 2023 (37)
- September 2023 (27)
- August 2023 (37)
- July 2023 (47)
- June 2023 (33)
- May 2023 (37)
- April 2023 (45)
- March 2023 (37)
- February 2023 (28)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (23)
- November 2022 (32)
- October 2022 (31)
- September 2022 (19)
- August 2022 (39)
- July 2022 (32)
- June 2022 (35)
- May 2022 (21)
- April 2022 (31)
- March 2022 (33)
- February 2022 (21)
- January 2022 (27)
- December 2021 (36)
- November 2021 (34)
- October 2021 (25)
- September 2021 (25)
- August 2021 (41)
- July 2021 (36)
- June 2021 (29)
- May 2021 (29)
- April 2021 (31)
- March 2021 (33)
- February 2021 (28)
- January 2021 (29)
- December 2020 (38)
- November 2020 (40)
- October 2020 (41)
- September 2020 (35)
- August 2020 (38)
- July 2020 (36)
- June 2020 (46)
- May 2020 (42)
- April 2020 (37)
- March 2020 (60)
- February 2020 (38)
- January 2020 (45)
- December 2019 (35)
- November 2019 (35)
- October 2019 (42)
- September 2019 (45)
- August 2019 (56)
- July 2019 (44)
- June 2019 (35)
- May 2019 (40)
- April 2019 (48)
- March 2019 (61)
- February 2019 (39)
- January 2019 (30)
- December 2018 (29)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (45)
- September 2018 (29)
- August 2018 (49)
- July 2018 (35)
- June 2018 (31)
- May 2018 (39)
- April 2018 (31)
- March 2018 (26)
- February 2018 (33)
- January 2018 (30)
- December 2017 (26)
- November 2017 (24)
- October 2017 (30)
- September 2017 (30)
- August 2017 (31)
- July 2017 (28)
- June 2017 (32)
- May 2017 (26)
- April 2017 (37)
- March 2017 (28)
- February 2017 (30)
- January 2017 (27)
- December 2016 (29)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (32)
- September 2016 (31)
- August 2016 (27)
- July 2016 (24)
- June 2016 (26)
- May 2016 (19)
- April 2016 (30)
- March 2016 (36)
- February 2016 (28)
- January 2016 (32)
- December 2015 (26)
- November 2015 (23)
- October 2015 (16)
- September 2015 (28)
- August 2015 (28)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- October 1991 (1)
- August 1989 (1)
- January 1988 (1)
- December 1983 (1)