FLASH REPORT: GM Wesley So is the Fischer Random World Champion

So with FIDE officials at the awards ceremony. Photo by Maria Emelianova.
At the Henie Onstad Kunstsenter art museum located close to Oslo, Norway, GM Wesley So became the first World Champion in Fischer Random Chess. So defeated GM Magnus Carlsen by the dominant score of 13.5 to 2.5 in the event that started on October 27 and ended on November 2. Wesley's victory, with four wins and only two draws, was so crushing that he clinched the title with six rounds to spare. In fact, the American cruised through the whole final stage of the event without suffering a single loss, showing his supremacy in this new chess variant. The match's fate was decided after Wesley won the second through fourth games. Magnus hasn't lost a game of classical chess since July 2018, representing 101 games. He has been the classical world champion since 2013 and the world number one since 2011, and has also been considered the unofficial Fischer Random champion having won a match in 2018 against GM Hikaru Nakamura. "I just want to congratulate Wesley So, he played a lot better than me," said the champion after his defeat, before expressing his frustration for his own poor play. Wesley So, who reached the number two spot in the FIDE world ranking back in 2017, achieves his first official world title in an individual competition—filling a hole in an already brilliant career, with numerous victories in top-level events.

Look for a full report on CLO next week. The official event website is here.

Comments

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Congratulations GM Wesley So‼️ More power to you! God bless

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Congratulations GM Wesley So‼️ More power to you! God bless

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Congratulation to GM Wesley So !!! You put the USA & Philippines to the map with regards to CHESS & FISCHER RANDOM CHESS !!! As they call it in chess, GM Wesley So is the name of the game of CHESS !!!

In reply to by SM Raymond Duque (not verified)

GM Wesley....congrats....the local boys of san diego (national city),cal. were proud of your achievements, also hand salute to the 1st ever champ of millionaires chess; vegas version...yours truly, the chess balladeer was there on board 2 with your 25 simul chess exhibion.......

In reply to by alejandrino c… (not verified)

The Chess Balladeer!

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

A very dominant play by Wesley Congratulations

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Wesley So just dominated the world chess champion Magnus Carlsen of Norway, plain and simple.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Very well done and deserved. Excellent job. Congratulations!

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Congratulations GM Wesley.... Proud Pinoy here

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Nobody did this before on Magnus, losing a series of games to an opponent. This result creates a legitimate question, is Wesley So better than Magnus Carlsen?

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

what happened to my comments?

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Fischer Random Chess -- is not "chess" -- and the result shows it. The world's best chess player (World Champion/highest ELO) did not perform well. What does this show? It shows that if you divorce chess positions from the "story line" that arises from the start of the game and remove the opening theory, then it becomes harder for experienced players to find their way in the games. This is similar to De Groot's memory experiments where (chess) experts had greater memory for board positions that represented real game positions -- vs. random piece arrangements. Fischer Random Chess is essentially a semi-random piece starting position. It is also similar to the advice on how to defeat a stronger player -- create a non-theoretical/novel/tactical/wild/unbalanced position. This does not take anything away from GM So's success -- but it does show that a "Fischer Random Chess World Championship" is not something to take seriously.

In reply to by Chesspride (not verified)

i don't understand your premise. two of the top players in the world qualified for the final. seems to me this disproves your theory of how to defeat stronger players.

In reply to by Chesspride (not verified)

It is a chess "variant", but what difference does it make? Both players would be operating under the similar handicap of being divorced from the starting position & openings. If So did better playing this variant that means he is the best Chess 960 player, period. Congratulations to Wesley So on his accomplishment.

In reply to by Chesspride (not verified)

What you said includes valid points. However, it also includes some "other" product of human nature. To clarify the validity of your statement it should be pointed out that to "not take anything away" and "nothing to take seriously" in the same breath shows a clear contradiction as I do believe there is serious contenders in serious dilemmas on the chess board. To develope advantage requires skill but the ability to adapt is a skill of the highest importance. But to move past this impurity and aim back to the validity I urge that we keep the facts as our target.... I just noticed I am not replying to a comment, but the discussion. I don't care to read all since the first absurd statement by ChessPride but I did glance to the latest so will respond with that as well. Whenever you allow yourself to be disturbed, the quality of information in such matters is at risk. This is as good example as any. To reply in blunt manner to match Id say that if Magnus gets mopped off the floor in an area of chess that requires something he clearly lacks, then as "World Champion of Chess" (as you so pointed out) is in serious need of something a champion requires by nature and should work on this. It's not fairy chess, and a champion is established by dominating opposition in contesting. That is exactly what happened to Magnus by Wesley So, and that is why he walked away as CHAMPION. GO USA!!!

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

My argument is that the contest has nothing to do with classical chess -- it is the same as if the two players played gin rummy or Stratego. The outcome is only surprising because the top classical chess player (i.e. World Chess Champion) did not win ... and in fact posted a poor score. That becomes less surprising when one realizes that what they competed at was not chess. Yes, both players competed under the same conditions...and yes, congratulations to the winner. But again -- if they played gin rummy, would you have expected Carlsen to win? The outcome -- like the starting board position -- is random in this case.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

To be blunt about it -- not every game or competition involving chess pieces...is chess. There are dozens of chess variants. The classical chess (regular starting position chess) world champion would not be expected to prevail in fairy chess or even postal chess. Thus, Fischer Random Chess -- while using chess pieces -- has little or nothing in common with the form of chess we usually refer to as chess. Thus, the element of surprise in the story -- that Carlsen did poorly -- is misplaced.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Magnus just played bad, same as when he was also suffered a defeat from Ding Liren. Not his time this year and Wesley So played brilliant in this tournament.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

There's no use arguing which one is better. But it is called Fischer Random because the one who named it, also suggested that this way of playing chess makes up for what is the fundamental problem of classical chess: the pre-occupation with opening theories which lead players to churn out memorized lines and sometimes results in boring plays. Of course, there is so much to study and this is somewhat unique for this brand of chess. Fischer Random, however, is not just another chess variant. Because creativity starts at move 1 and careful planning is a must immediately, this has a possibility of even surpassing the attraction of classical chess. This was what Bobby Fischer wanted a long time ago. Players with more natural talent have more chances for success than studious practitioners, especially during this computer age. Just imagine world championships that require more creativity rather than having the back-up of the entourage of seconds and trainers. Imagine the world youth in the last championship round, where a player wins because they are better prepared with the array of seconds Russia can provide. A player from an undeveloped country has better chances of showing their true talent against players with established chess traditions. Even in regular club play, like in my Ashburn Chess Club, I have observed gifted players shine when they have avoided the traps in opening play. Every time, there is something new, and club players won't be repeating positions consistently. Fischer Random can usher wider interests in chess. I hope to organize a FRchess tournament in the near future.

In reply to by Herky del Mundo (not verified)

Very well said.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Fischer Random chess can be a legit variant of chess. Same chess rules applies but only pieces position are different, so in effect nullifies opening theory. What does it indicate of GM So prowess as a chess player? Well, lots of things, he may well be a future contender to the World Chess Crown and may even become a World Champion someday but it strongly indicates that he is a very strong player, it's like beating the world champion in some end game or semi-endgame positions disregarding the opening where those positions had risen. Because nowadays, opening preparation in classical chess is a very vital component for tournaments at IGM's level much more, in a World Championship. So we can't really say that what Wesley accomplished in Fischer Random chess can equate in classical World Chess Championship, but there is a very strong indication.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

In a game of classical chess once you get past the opening it's just a game of chess. Fischer random is just a game of chess from move 1. It is a very interesting game for this reason. You cannot prepare for it in the same manner as classical. Whoever is better at calculating and planning will win. Not who has better book line preparation . Both however are great games! It's nice to be able to have something to study as well.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

A comment was mistakenly misplaced by a misunderstanding I apologize for. It may be found in response to the first comment by ChessPride on the contesting of the Champions true Championship. Again I say GO USA!! :-)

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Congrats! The next champ is always around the corner as many greats have found out.

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Plain Text Comments

Share Your Feedback

We recently completed a website update. If you notice a formatting error on this page, please click here.