It started with 142 grandmasters (and two wildcards) in a nine-round bloodbath. From there, 76 players made it to a series of sudden death knockout matches, where only 54 were able to play on. Players were relegated to lower divisions and losers’ brackets as chaos and confusion ensued. But when the dust settled, we arrived exactly where we expected: Carlsen and Nakamura in the Grand Finals with $30,000 on the line.
Joining the two heavyweights in Division I were automatic qualifier GM Wesley So and notorious speedster GM Alireza Firouzja. The inclusion of Indian prodigies Gukesh D and Arjun Erigaisi was hardly a surprise, either. But one benefit to the new format’s multi-tiered seeding system was it allowed a few underdogs to join the fold. For instance, Azeri GM Rauf Mamedov was a surprise to finish in the top of an event where his compatriot Radjabov failed to qualify for the lowest division.
The biggest shock, though, had to be Russian GM Alexey Sarana knocking out eventual Division II champ GM Fabiano Caruana to earn the final spot in Division I. After losing the first game of the play-in match, Sarana first won on demand to force tiebreaks.
Then, he ran it back, winning on demand again against Caruana’s draw odds. The match was particularly bitter for Caruana, as he had winning (and drawing) chances in each game.
Another name missing from the top eight was Russian GM Daniil Dubov. Despite a strong finish in the Swiss qualifier, he drew an unfortunate pairing in a slightly underperforming Nakamura. The head-to-head, however, lived up to the hype.
In the main bracket, Nakamura and So were on course to meet in the semi-finals. But upsets were not out of the question.
Nakamura took care of Gukesh in typical fashion, eschewing theoretical and critical variations and letting his opponent make increasingly committal choices.
So certainly had his hands full against Mamedov. At one moment, he even found himself up an exchange yet holding on for dear life. He managed to navigate the game to a more open board and slowly outplayed his well-prepared opponent.
This set up a semifinal match between the two Americans. The first few games were tense, but neither player was able to land a decisive blow. Then, a quick Berlin draw in the fourth game set up Armageddon. Nakamura wanted to play as Black with draw odds, and managed to undercut So’s bid for time. As a result, Nakamura played the tiebreaker with only nine minutes to So’s 15. But, draw odds are such a draw for a reason.
As Nakamura prepared for his winners’ final match, So had more work to do. First, he dispatched Sarana in consecutive games in the losers’ quarterfinals.
Then, he played one of the more complete games of the tournament against Arjun to earn his spot in the losers’ final and a chance to get into the Grand Finals.
As it turned out, So would have to win a rematch against Nakamura for this opportunity. Carlsen had a relatively easy time reaching the winners’ final, defeating Sarana and Arjun. His first win against Sarana was particularly impressive.
The winners’ final took a similar course to Nakamura’s first match against So. A few tense games failed to deliver anything decisive, and the fourth game ended quickly. Then, as it looked like Nakamura was headed for another Black in Armageddon, there was fire off the board.
These two are just the best. @MagnusCarlsen outbids Nakamura by one second in the armageddon tiebreaker!@GMHikaru can only laugh. pic.twitter.com/d1vvCouC6C
— Chess.com (@chesscom) February 8, 2023
The one extra second proved pivotal, as Carlsen held the draw to win the match.
After two more draws in the losers’ final, Nakamura again earned Black in the tiebreaker. Nevertheless, he still played a bit recklessly, and, for most of the game, he was in danger of losing. But So could never find the right time to break through, and eventually Nakamura emerged victorious.
In the first game of the Grand Finals, Carlsen finally broke through the series of draws.
After playing it safe the rest of the match, Carlsen emerged victorious with $30,000. Nakamura earned $20,000 for finishing second. With five more events this season, the race is on for who can join the two frontrunners to compete for additional prizes in the playoffs.
Categories
Archives
- November 2024 (7)
- October 2024 (35)
- September 2024 (23)
- August 2024 (27)
- July 2024 (44)
- June 2024 (27)
- May 2024 (32)
- April 2024 (51)
- March 2024 (34)
- February 2024 (25)
- January 2024 (26)
- December 2023 (29)
- November 2023 (26)
- October 2023 (37)
- September 2023 (27)
- August 2023 (37)
- July 2023 (47)
- June 2023 (33)
- May 2023 (37)
- April 2023 (45)
- March 2023 (37)
- February 2023 (28)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (23)
- November 2022 (32)
- October 2022 (31)
- September 2022 (19)
- August 2022 (39)
- July 2022 (32)
- June 2022 (35)
- May 2022 (21)
- April 2022 (31)
- March 2022 (33)
- February 2022 (21)
- January 2022 (27)
- December 2021 (36)
- November 2021 (34)
- October 2021 (25)
- September 2021 (25)
- August 2021 (41)
- July 2021 (36)
- June 2021 (29)
- May 2021 (29)
- April 2021 (31)
- March 2021 (33)
- February 2021 (28)
- January 2021 (29)
- December 2020 (38)
- November 2020 (40)
- October 2020 (41)
- September 2020 (35)
- August 2020 (38)
- July 2020 (36)
- June 2020 (46)
- May 2020 (42)
- April 2020 (37)
- March 2020 (60)
- February 2020 (38)
- January 2020 (45)
- December 2019 (35)
- November 2019 (35)
- October 2019 (42)
- September 2019 (45)
- August 2019 (56)
- July 2019 (44)
- June 2019 (35)
- May 2019 (40)
- April 2019 (48)
- March 2019 (61)
- February 2019 (39)
- January 2019 (30)
- December 2018 (29)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (45)
- September 2018 (29)
- August 2018 (49)
- July 2018 (35)
- June 2018 (31)
- May 2018 (39)
- April 2018 (31)
- March 2018 (26)
- February 2018 (33)
- January 2018 (30)
- December 2017 (26)
- November 2017 (24)
- October 2017 (30)
- September 2017 (30)
- August 2017 (31)
- July 2017 (28)
- June 2017 (32)
- May 2017 (26)
- April 2017 (37)
- March 2017 (28)
- February 2017 (30)
- January 2017 (27)
- December 2016 (29)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (32)
- September 2016 (31)
- August 2016 (27)
- July 2016 (24)
- June 2016 (26)
- May 2016 (19)
- April 2016 (30)
- March 2016 (36)
- February 2016 (28)
- January 2016 (32)
- December 2015 (26)
- November 2015 (23)
- October 2015 (16)
- September 2015 (28)
- August 2015 (28)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- October 1991 (1)
- August 1989 (1)
- January 1988 (1)
- December 1983 (1)