Why do we play chess?
When I was younger, it was clear: to win.
I wanted to win my section. I wanted to defeat titled players. I wanted to qualify for invitationals. I wanted my rating to skyrocket to the moon.
As my grandfather used to say when the family would play an innocuous game of Yahtzee, “Winning isn't everything. It's the only thing.”
I had plenty of tournaments where I was ecstatic because of my performance. But as all chess players know---good, bad, great, and terrible results are all par for the course.
During tournaments with mediocre to poor results, I would spend the weekend haunted by some move I should’ve played, some gap in my preparation, or even a pre-game superstition (come on, we all have them...).
Looking back, I think I really missed the point.
When I see a student feeling down about a tough tournament, I assure them that all that matters is that they’ve learned something and that they enjoyed playing.
I know from my own experiences that a low result is no reason to be discouraged, especially when you’re a young and up-and-coming player. In a few months, they’ll have some vast gain in understanding and jump 300 rating points seemingly effortlessly.
Despite assuring students of this, I haven't always been very good at following my own advice and often allow my tournament experiences to be defined by the numbers on the crosstable.
This tournament (the Western Class Open), I set out with a different approach. Entering the tournament ranked just a few places above last in the Masters section, I wanted to start the event with reasonable goals---goals based on the chess aspect and the actual quality of my games.
Before the 1st round, I wrote down a short list of goals aimed at enjoying my games and using the tournament as a tool for improvement.
Pre-Tournament Goals
- Shake off the rust from my recent hiatus (I hadn’t played in a tournament setting for about 6 months).
- Play energetic chess, create games full of life and active pieces.
- Practice better time management.
- Sacrifice something--- As in, if I saw an interesting idea, even if it required a material deficit, I'd try it out.
1. Shake off the rust from my recent hiatus.
“Chess is two parts: knowledge and playing tendencies. It is impossible to improve one without the other, and playing habits can only truly be worked on within the confines and pressures of a tournament.” -NM Pete Karagianis, “The Struggle”, Chess Life March 2016 IssueThis goal is like taking a class Pass/Fail. Just by entering the tournament and playing each round, I’ve gotten some practice and remembered what it’s like to be there: opponent sitting across from me, clock ticking down, the stoic feel of the tournament hall looming over every move. Chess in theory is about clarity: You can map out every relevant variation of an opening. You can calculate through every line of a complex tactic. You can carefully examine the subtle technique required to win a theoretical ending. Chess in practice is about fight. At some point, the game goes into uncharted territory. It’s you versus your opponent, navigating through a sea of ideas, variations, complications. Everything that seemed so crystal clear when you were studying at home with Stockfish beside you, offering suggestions and evaluations… is up in the air. I reached the following position after an inaccurate piece sacrifice. My position still has some compensation because Black's pawn structure is fragmented, and his bishop is blocked while my bishop slices across the board. However, with each exchange of pieces, my chances lessen.
[pgn][White "West, Vanessa"] [Black "Fields, Noah"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "5rk1/p2b3p/2p1p1p1/2pn4/8/1P1PqR2/PBP3PP/3Q3K w - - 0 23"] [PlyCount "4"]{With Black’s last move (22…Rf8), he’s hoping for an exchange of both rooks and queens with} 23. Rxe3 Nxe3 24. Qe2 Rf1+ {Can I save the game?} * [/pgn]
White to move.
[pgn] [White "West, Vanessa"] [Black "Fields, Noah"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "5rk1/p2b3p/2p1p1p1/2pn4/8/1P1PqR2/PBP3PP/3Q3K w - - 0 23"] [PlyCount "13"]23. Rxe3 Nxe3 24. Qe2 Rf1+ 25. Qxf1 Nxf1 26. Bc1 $1 {Trapping the knight and winning the piece back. The resulting endgame is equal. After} Kf7 27. Kg1 Nxh2 28. Kxh2 Kf6 29. Be3 {White wins the pawn back without any trouble.} * [/pgn]
2. Play energetic chess, create games full of life and active pieces.
While my accuracy was questionable at times, I was fairly content with the activity of my pieces throughout the games.[pgn] [White "West, Vanessa"] [Black "Fields, Noah"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r1b2rk1/p1qp2pp/2p1pb2/2pnN3/4N3/1P1P4/PBP2PPP/R2Q1RK1 w - - 0 13"] [PlyCount "7"]{In this position, I played} 13. f4 {adding central support to my knight and involving the rooks in the kingside play. My piece activity in the position is undeniable. Even though the move sacrifices material in 3 different ways, because of White's resulting pressure, Stockfish doesn't recommend any of them for Black:} Ne3 ({Accepting the pawn sacrifice with} 13... Nxf4 {loses:} 14. Rxf4 Bxe5 15. Rxf8+ Kxf8 16. Qf3+ Ke7 17. Rf1) 14. Qh5 Nxf1 (14... Nxc2 15. Ng5 $40) 15. Nxf6+ Rxf6 (15... gxf6 $2 16. Ng4 $18) 16. Nc4 {with compensation.} *[/pgn]
3. Practice better time management.
"When I learned to play chess it really was thought that there’s a best move in every position and you can find it, but now with the appearance and spread of computers it’s become clear to everyone that in many positions there’s a certain number of moves that are equally strong. It’s very difficult to find the golden mean between getting into time trouble and just quickly “bashing out” moves. Sometimes players move quickly – bang-bang-bang, and then it turns out there’s a lot of time left, but it’s time to resign." -GM Alexander GrischukThis is the area where I need the most improvement. Looking over the amount of time I had left after each move on my scoresheets, there was only one game where I made it past the 30th move with more than 1 minute left on my clock for the remaining 10 moves until time control. In one of my games, having no time left to properly assess the endgame cost me. It’s a double-edged sword though. I don’t want to make weaker moves in my quest to reserve time for later. How does one strike a balance? In his Chess.com article, “Targets, Time Pressure, and Reaching Expert”, IM Jeremy Silman recommends these strategies for improving time management:
- Pick up as many opening, middlegame, endgame, and tactical patterns as possible. Doing this will enable you to read a position quickly and save huge amounts of time on your clock.
- Be practical. You can’t calculate everything. You most likely don’t have all those patterns in your memory bank. So, master basic tactics (which is easy to do), study basic strategic ideas, make the moves you think the position needs as quickly as possible, and let the fates do the rest.
4. Sacrifice something.
"You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one." -Mikhail TalI went overboard on this one, and ended up sacrificing material at least once every game. Trial and error is useful, though---to obtain a better feel for the difference between a fascinating sacrifice full of ideas and compensation vs. an unsound sacrifice. Here's my most unsound sacrifice from the tournament:
Unsound Sacrifice
[pgn] [White "West, Vanessa"] [Black "Tovmasyan, Hamlet"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r1b2rk1/pp1nbppp/1q2p3/3pP3/Q7/3B1N2/PP1B1PPP/R4RK1 w - - 0 14"] [PlyCount "4"] [SourceDate "2016.03.16"] {In this position, I played} 14. Ba5 $2 {, believing that my better developed pieces would provide compensation and that the pawn on b2 would turn out to be poisoned because Black's queen on the verge of being trapped (it's only escape is on a3). After} Qxb2 {I realized that my pieces are too uncoordinated and loose for the sacrifice to be sound. For example, if} 15. Bc7 ({Attempts to trap the queen fail:} 15. Nd4 Nxe5 16. a3 Nxd3 17. Rfb1 Qxf2+) (15. Rfc1 Nxe5 16. Bc3 Nxf3+ 17. gxf3 Qa3) (15. Rab1 Qa3) 15... Qc3 {creates a double attack on my bishops.}*[/pgn]
Fascinating Sacrifice
On the other hand, in the ongoing Candidates tournament, Levon Aronian showed a lot of creativity when he sacrificed not one, not two, but three pawns against Fabiano Caruana. “You see? I mated you, my friend!” Aronian said jovially to Caruana during their post-game analysis. Photo courtesy of World Chess
[pgn] [White "Levon Aronian"] [Black "Fabiano Caruana"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A77"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "r2qr1k1/1p1n1pbp/p2p2p1/2pP4/2P1PP2/2N4P/PBQ3P1/4RRK1 w - - 0 20"] [PlyCount "21"] [EventDate "2016.??.??"] {At this point, Aronian played} 20. e5 $5 {Pawn number one.} dxe5 21. f5 { creating pressure on Caruanas's kingside and securing the e4 square as an outpost for his knight.} b5 22. Ne4 Nb6 23. Bc1 {Two pawns.} ({Initially, Aronian was planning} 23. f6 Bf8 24. h4 Nxc4 25. h5 Qxd5 26. hxg6 hxg6 {and went on to win the post-game analysis against Caruana during the press conference:} 27. Qb3 $1 Qd7 28. Qg3 Nxb2 29. Qh2 Qg4 30. Re3 $1) 23... Nxc4 24. d6 {Three!} gxf5 25. Rxf5 Nxd6 26. Bg5 Qa5 27. Bd2 {Stockfish evaluates this position as 0.5 in Black's favor. However, for Aronian to have 2.5 points worth of compensation despite Caruana's three pawn advantage means the position is very difficult for Black to play. Even a player as strong as Caruana didn't want to test Aronian's attack and opted for a three-time repetition.} Qd8 28. Bg5 Qa5 29. Bd2 Qd8 30. Bg5 1/2-1/2[/pgn]
What I’ve Learned
"If you aren't 2600 FIDE, you should be expecting to make serious mistakes all of the time, and your best chance to get better is to actually experience these mistakes, internalize them, think about and obsess over fixing them in future tournaments."
-IM Greg Shahade, "The Second Step to a Comeback", Chess Life Online 2011
1. Study endgames leading up to a tournament.
Studying endgames is a given, but I realized that endgame study is useful, not just in general, but as short-term preparation leading up to an event. Why? If you’re like me and get into time pressure, you’re most likely going to reach the endgame with very little time to think. Even with more practical time management, long games can lead to time scramble endings. Having endgame ideas, principles, and theoretical positions fresh on your mind helps a lot when you have 2 minutes left to make all of your decisions. After finishing one of my games, I witnessed this theoretical endgame with Black to move between WIM Annie Wang and Expert Rickie Simms.[pgn] [Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "?"] [Black "?"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "1R6/8/4r3/8/8/p4K2/8/k7 b - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "3"] {I was excited to see this position in action at a tournament because, as fascinating endgames are, I rarely get to see theoretical ones in tournament play. Wang played} 1... a2 {setting up Black's only attempt to win. And, to my dismay, White immediately played} 2. Rb7 $4 {The truth is, White is lost here with best play, but White can very much test Black’s knowledge---thirteen precise moves worth of knowledge. Watching Simms‘s casual posture and how quickly he moved, it was clear that he mistakenly believed the game to be easily drawn. After Wang’s reply (she looked visibly delighted that he missed the key move)} Re1 {, he then started a long think, but it was too late to even make the game a fight.} * [/pgn]What should white do?
White to move. Find the best defense.
The key to playing for a draw in a worse position is to look for all of your opponent’s attempts to win. Then, make each attempt as difficult as possible.
Here, Black only has one winning attempt: ...Re1, ...Rb1, letting the king out of its cage and preparing the a-pawn’s promotion.
How can white make this idea more difficult to achieve?
[pgn] [White "Rickie Simms"] [Black "Annie Wang"] [Result "*"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "1R6/8/4r3/8/8/5K2/p7/k7 w - - 0 2"] [PlyCount "24"]2. Kf2 $1 {The black rook will now have to take a longer route to b1, giving white’s king more time to join the fight.} Rh6 3. Ke3 Rh1 4. Kd3 {This square instead of d2 is crucial.} Rb1 5. Ra8 Kb2 {Here comes the king.} 6. Rb8+ Kc1 $1 {The king has nowhere else to go.} ({If} 6... Ka3 7. Ra8+ Kb3 { Black’s king has to continue defending the a2-pawn.} 8. Rb8+ {and Black can’t make progress. This is why white’s king belongs on d3, blocking black’s king from the c4 square.}) 7. Rc8+ Kd1 8. Rh8 Rb3+ ({Of course,} 8... a1=Q 9. Rh1#) 9. Kc4 Rc3+ {A very important move.} (9... Ra3 $2 {fumbles the win:} 10. Rh1+ Kd2 11. Rh2+ {is a draw: Black’s king cannot escape check or stay in the vicinity of the a-pawn.} Ke1 (11... Ke3 12. Rh3+) 12. Rh1+ Kf2 13. Ra1 {when the a-pawn will be lost.} Ke2 14. Kb4 Ra8 15. Kb3) 10. Kd4 (10. Kxc3 a1=Q+) 10... Ra3 11. Rh1+ Kc2 12. Rh2+ Kb3 13. Rh3+ Kb4 {and Black wins.} * [/pgn]
2. Opening knowledge is only valuable if you understand the middlegames that arise when theory ends.
In my last round, my opponent played an opening I was fairly familiar with. I blitzed out the first 12 moves which involved a very interesting pawn sac, and then my opponent deviated from the most common move. I'd looked at the variation years ago in what I thought was enough detail: I had looked over a few GM games (including a Carlsen game I could play out by heart). Yet, I was stumped. I spent 30 minutes over the board trying to understand the position, chose an idea that was absolutely incorrect, and had to struggle the entire game to hold a draw. The game showed me that I have to reassess the way I've been studying openings. In his book, Studying Chess Made Easy, GM Andrew Soltis devotes an entire chapter to “the right way to study an opening”. He describes the moment where one’s book knowledge ends as “leaving the station” and gives this advice to prepare for it:“You want to know what your options are, expressed in terms of goals, maneuvers and plans... You need to grasp what David Bronstein called the ‘positional essence’ of the situations that arise.”Soltis demonstrates "positional essence" with the following example:
White to move.
White's assets and plans- White has more space.
- He controls a terrific outpost at d5, which he'd like to continue to occupy with his knight.
- White may try to pressure the weak pawns at a5 or d6.
- Black can attack the b- and e-pawns.
- He can target White's uncastled king.
- He has the two bishops.
- One of his bishops is "bad", and trading it for a knight may make sense.
Conclusion
Overall, it was a worthwhile tournament experience, which gave me an awareness of some of the gaps in my play and study habits. Continuing the never-ending quest for chess improvement, I'll go back to the drawing board, make adjustments, and try to implement them in future tournaments. My next one will be the Lina Grumette Memorial Day Classic.Categories
Archives
- October 2024 (11)
- September 2024 (23)
- August 2024 (27)
- July 2024 (44)
- June 2024 (27)
- May 2024 (32)
- April 2024 (51)
- March 2024 (34)
- February 2024 (25)
- January 2024 (26)
- December 2023 (29)
- November 2023 (26)
- October 2023 (37)
- September 2023 (27)
- August 2023 (37)
- July 2023 (47)
- June 2023 (33)
- May 2023 (37)
- April 2023 (45)
- March 2023 (37)
- February 2023 (28)
- January 2023 (31)
- December 2022 (23)
- November 2022 (32)
- October 2022 (31)
- September 2022 (19)
- August 2022 (39)
- July 2022 (32)
- June 2022 (35)
- May 2022 (21)
- April 2022 (31)
- March 2022 (33)
- February 2022 (21)
- January 2022 (27)
- December 2021 (36)
- November 2021 (34)
- October 2021 (25)
- September 2021 (25)
- August 2021 (41)
- July 2021 (36)
- June 2021 (29)
- May 2021 (29)
- April 2021 (31)
- March 2021 (33)
- February 2021 (28)
- January 2021 (29)
- December 2020 (38)
- November 2020 (40)
- October 2020 (41)
- September 2020 (35)
- August 2020 (38)
- July 2020 (36)
- June 2020 (46)
- May 2020 (42)
- April 2020 (37)
- March 2020 (60)
- February 2020 (38)
- January 2020 (45)
- December 2019 (35)
- November 2019 (35)
- October 2019 (42)
- September 2019 (45)
- August 2019 (56)
- July 2019 (44)
- June 2019 (35)
- May 2019 (40)
- April 2019 (48)
- March 2019 (61)
- February 2019 (39)
- January 2019 (30)
- December 2018 (29)
- November 2018 (51)
- October 2018 (45)
- September 2018 (29)
- August 2018 (49)
- July 2018 (35)
- June 2018 (31)
- May 2018 (39)
- April 2018 (31)
- March 2018 (26)
- February 2018 (33)
- January 2018 (30)
- December 2017 (26)
- November 2017 (24)
- October 2017 (30)
- September 2017 (30)
- August 2017 (32)
- July 2017 (27)
- June 2017 (32)
- May 2017 (26)
- April 2017 (37)
- March 2017 (28)
- February 2017 (30)
- January 2017 (27)
- December 2016 (29)
- November 2016 (24)
- October 2016 (32)
- September 2016 (31)
- August 2016 (27)
- July 2016 (24)
- June 2016 (26)
- May 2016 (19)
- April 2016 (30)
- March 2016 (37)
- February 2016 (27)
- January 2016 (33)
- December 2015 (25)
- November 2015 (23)
- October 2015 (16)
- September 2015 (28)
- August 2015 (28)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- October 1991 (1)
- August 1989 (1)
- January 1988 (1)
- December 1983 (1)