Double Trouble: The World Open Begins in Philadelphia

Jeffery Xiong is among the top seeds at the World Open, Photo: Austin Fuller
Philadelphia — Stephen West anticipated he would have a tough time finding a mixed doubles partner here at the 45th annual World Open, so he “camped out” early Saturday morning near the registration desk in hopes of finding one. West had already asked GM Irina Krush, of New York, and NM Carissa Yip, of his home state of Massachusetts, only to learn the distinguished ladies of chess had other plans. “That would have been cool,” West said of being paired with Krush or Yip. West’s hopes were not dashed completely, though. He got lucky when Nimmi Kumar, of North Carolina, arrived to register her two daughters, including 12-year-old Arya Kumar, who says she was weirded out by the whole thing and would have preferred to play with someone she knew. “They didn’t want to do it. I had to convince them,” Nimmi Kumar said of pairing her daughters with mixed doubles partners. “There’s no downside but they think it’s kind of weird.” Of course, there’s nothing weird about walking away with $1500, which the two first place winners of the mixed doubles prize will get here at the 45th annual World Open. Organizers say the premier event of the Continental Chess Association is expected to draw more than 1200 players — which so far include more than two dozen GMs from countries as diverse as Peru, Cuba, Israel and Russia, and a similar number of IMs — by the time the three-day schedule starts Sunday. The event continues through Independence Day. You can follow along with live games at pgn files at The event has drawn an eclectic mix of individuals from near and far, including several who like to sport sunglasses inside — for reasons that range from shielding their eyes from their opponents to being sensitive to light — and at least one player who likes to do calisthenics in the middle of his game. Up for grabs is $225,000 in prizes. With such a high-stakes tournament, one wouldn’t expect to see oddly careless situations such as two opponents recording their Round One game against each other as a win despite each one having scoresheets that showed they lost. But that’s what happened in the U1800 on the six-day schedule. “So each player who was claiming a win produced a scoresheet that shows they lost,” said assistant tournament director David Hater. The situation — which several seasoned tournament directors said they had never seen before — occurred in the below-listed game, when White was about to take Black’s queen and thought his opponent resigned because his opponent had extended his hand.

[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "White"]
[Black "Black"]
[Result "*"]
[PlyCount "140"]

1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 c6 4. h3 Qc7 5. Nf3 e5 6. dxe5 dxe5 7. Bc4 h6 8. O-O
Be7 9. Qe2 Nbd7 10. Be3 b5 11. Bd3 Nc5 12. a3 Be6 13. Nd2 Nxd3 14. cxd3 Rd8 15.
f4 exf4 16. Bxf4 Qd7 17. Rf3 Qd4+ 18. Kh1 O-O 19. Bh2 a5 20. Bg1 Qd7 21. d4 b4
22. Nd1 bxa3 23. bxa3 Rb8 24. Nc3 Rb2 25. Qd3 Rd8 26. Nc4 Rb3 27. Qe2 Bxc4 28.
Qxc4 Rxa3 29. Rxa3 Bxa3 30. e5 Nd5 31. Ne4 Bb4 32. Nc5 Nb6 33. Qb3 Qd5 34. Qb1
Nc4 35. Qc2 Bxc5 36. dxc5 Nxe5 37. Ra3 Ra8 38. Ra4 Qd3 39. Qa2 Qd5 40. Qe2 f6
41. Qc2 Qd3 42. Qa2+ Qd5 43. Qc2 Kf8 44. Bf2 Qd8 45. Qc3 Qd3 46. Qa1 Qb5 47.
Bg1 Nd7 48. Qd4 Kg8 49. Kh2 Qb8+ 50. Kh1 Ne5 51. Qa1 Qc7 52. Be3 Qd8 53. Qa2+
Qd5 54. Qc2 Kh8 55. Bg1 Qd3 56. Qa2 Qd5 57. Qc2 Ra7 58. Rd4 Qg8 59. Ra4 Qa8 60.
Bf2 Rd7 61. Be1 Qa6 62. Rxa5 Qf1+ 63. Kh2 g6 64. Bg3 Kg7 65. Qa2 Nc4 66. Ra6
Ne5 67. Ra8 Nc4 68. Rc8 h5 69. Rxc6 Rd2 70. Qa8 Qxg2# *[/pgn]
But his opponent thought he checkmated White with Qxg2 and was extending his hand as if to say the game was over, according to Hater. “The problem is his scoresheet shows he was checkmated because he left off the moves Rc7 and Kh6,” Hater said. The situation shows the importance of diligently recording one’s moves. Harold Stenzel, a tournament director, said the incident also shows the importance of clear communication over the board. “When someone extends their hand, you find out why their hand is out,” Stenzel said. Jamaal Abdul-Alim, of Washington, DC, can be reached at or follow him on Twitter @dcwriter360. Follow the World Open at


In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

the use of "his and "he" are kind of non-specific here, and confusing. who did what? it would help to present both scoresheets and use more specific references, such as player a and player b

In reply to by jane doe (not verified)

We used "White" for the player with the White pieces

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Am curious what the ruling was on the game in the U1800 section. Hats off to Hal Stenzel for properly reminding us that a handshake indicates nothing about the result of the game.

In reply to by Brennan Price (not verified)

If the game score in the article reflects the moves actually played, then the solution is easy.

In reply to by Brennan Price (not verified)

“The problem is his scoresheet shows he was checkmated because he left off the moves Rc7 and Kh6,” Hater said.

In reply to by Gary Kevin Ware (not verified)

That doesn't answer the question presented. The scoresheets ought not be relevant after a mate is determined to have or have not occurred, only if there is a dispute that cannot be resolved by impartial observation or mutual agreement. There are three most likely outcomes: White wins, Black wins, or play continues from the last position that can be reconstructed. The story does not indicate the result and the ruling that preceded it. I'm wondering what the outcome was and why.

In reply to by Brennan Price (not verified)

Sorry, should read: "The scoresheets ought not be relevant after a mate is determined to have occurred . . ." (delete "or have not").

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

According to the rulebook it is not necessary to record everything single move in time trouble. Filling in the scoresheet after the game ends is allowed. Since mate is on the board, and if the player can complete his scoresheet, there is no issue.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

After reviewing both scoresheets, BOTH players agreed that the moves Rc7 and Kh6 had in fact been played, that the game had not ended in checkmate and that black in fact lost his queen and he then agreed he lost the game. The game score shown above was WHITE'S scoresheet. He left off the moves Rc7 and Kh6. Black's scoresheet correctly showed that Rc7 and Kh6 were in fact played and there was no checkmate (even though his scoresheet said Qxg2#). Both Harold Srenzel and I agree that this case was made considerably easier by the fact that both players were honest and both agreed to all the facts (albeit after reporting the result). Dave Hater

In reply to by David Hater (not verified)

Thanks, David. I wish I had made that clearer in the story. I just thought it was sort of obvious.

In reply to by David Hater (not verified)

Thanks, David, for the clarification, and thanks, Jamaal, for presenting an interesting case.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

It's something of a sad commentary when the fact that the players were honest is the first thing the TD's mention.

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Plain Text Comments

Share Your Feedback

We recently completed a website update. If you notice a formatting error on this page, please click here.